Full Masks breaking price floor for BACK Accessory Type allowing price cuts

This issue causes back accessories labeled as “full masks” to be cheaper, even though they’re a back accessory and not a mask.
The problems with this is that people are able to sell back items cheaper if they include a “mask” inside of the item, making it appear cheaper on the catalog and cutting price floors while also using bigger boundary boxes. This shouldn’t be happening

Visual Aids:


(normal accessories)


(Full masks)

Direct Links:

Expected behavior

Full masks back accessories should cost equal or more than regular accessories.
Full masks shouldn’t be anything but face & head accessories

2 Likes

Thank you for the report. We have assigned to our team for review.

Hi @idelww, thanks for the report!

The item you brought up should actually be a bodysuit - I’ve updated it to fix this gap. Let me know if there’s any other cases like this. Otherwise, I’ll close out the ticket in a couple days!

1 Like

Thank you, however this still doesn’t fix the issue of items using wrong category for higher bounds and less price! would be nice if bodysuits still wouldn’t be able to go below back accessory prices if they’re set as back accessories

Since categories like bodysuit and full mask are autodetected, there are cases where the original category selected (like back accessory) has a higher price floor than the one we want for the item.

This is expected behavior at the moment!