Hatching 3 eggs makes the pets lag a bit compared to hatching one egg

Help and Feedback Scripting Support
1 
local i  = 0
	
	while i < 180 do
		petModel:SetCFrame(CFrame.Angles(0,i/18 / math.pi * 2 % (math.pi * 2), 0) * CFrame.Angles(math.rad(-10),0,0))
		petModel2:SetCFrame(CFrame.Angles(0,i/18 / math.pi * 2 % (math.pi * 2), 0) * CFrame.Angles(math.rad(-10),0,0))
		petModel3:SetCFrame(CFrame.Angles(0,i/18 / math.pi * 2 % (math.pi * 2), 0) * CFrame.Angles(math.rad(-10),0,0))
		i += 1

		task.wait()
	end

When I hatch one egg, it is buttery smooth, but when I hatch 3, the pets are going at like 30 fps. I believe it is because of this code but I don’t know how to optimize it.

2

Do the calculation once and then apply it three times, and maybe do some pre-calculations outside the loop and remove the task.wait() because this will only run for 180 iterations, like this:

local i = 0;
local FIXED = CFrame.Angles(math.rad(-10),0,0);
local MODULO = 2 % (math.pi * 2);
while i < 180 do
	
	local cframe = CFrame.Angles(0,i/18/math.pi * MODULO,0) * FIXED;
	petModel:PivotTo(cframe);
	petModel2:PivotTo(cframe);
	petModel3:PivotTo(cframe);
	i += 1;
end

I’m sure there is another shortcut on the second CFrame.Angles() but it eludes me.

3

Not sure if this’ll work (or if it’s efficient), but worth a try.

4

You could also pre-calculate all these CFrames and store them in a table since there are only 180 of them and just iterate that using a for i=0,180 do loop instead of a while loop. You would have to benchmark which performs the best of course.

5

Why remove the wait? without the wait it just goes for like 1/100 of a second then dissapears, I wanted the effect to be about 3 seconds thats why the wait was there

6

No problem, keep it in if required. Did this in anyway improve the performance of the original code?

How about the table iterator with the pre-calculated CFrames? Did this offer any improvement to the original?

7

Not much, if any. Also PivotTo didnt work so I changed it to SetCFrame