Should math.random not be used for new work?

Help and Feedback Scripting Support
#1

Hey, so I’m aware of the new random class that was added recently, where you can create new instances of random, and use the methods upon it, like so:

local generator = Random.new()

print(generator:NextInteger(1, 2))

Does that mean math.random is deprecated or shouldn’t be used for new work? I sometimes use it for cases where I don’t want to create a new instance of it, so I just call random instead for simplicity.

Thanks. :slight_smile:

#2

I have never used random.
However, I do not think math.random() is deprecated, and i’ve never had any issues with it.

2 Likes
#3

The math.random function is perfectly fine to use. When you’re just making one or two calls, it seems a bit silly to make a new Random object.

Edit: I’d hardly call it recent, by the way. It was added in 2017.

5 Likes
#4

Also they use the same algorithm now.

The Random class does have its benefits though

  • Seeds are exclusive to specific instances (math.randomseed affects all scripts)
  • You can generate non-integers without needing to do any extra math
3 Likes
#5

math.random() completely works, however it is capped at the signed 32 bit integer limit (2.14Billion), which the new Random class isn’t. Random:NextInteger() is capped at the signed 64 bit integer limit (9.22 Quintillion). and Random:NextNumber() is capped at the float64 limit (1.8*(10^308)). So i suggest using Random:NextNumber() and then using math.round to round up the Number (since double values can store a lot of decimals and blow your head)

1 Like