0.1 + 2.8 ~= 1.1 + 1.8

I can see where you’re coming from, but its something you have to deal with as a developer.

What happens here is the floating-point error. Super interesting subject in mathematics and computer science. Long story short computers cant store the exact value of some decimal numbers.

As someone stated already you’ll have to use .format when working with float values.

You’re right, but floating-point errors are bound to happen. For example, running 0.1 + 0.2 in languages like Python or JavaScript, would return:

image

1 Like

Unfortunately, these anomalies are ‘normal’ when it comes to floating-point and you will have to live with them.
You can use my ‘Round’ function described in this topic, to avoid this problem.

1 Like

Floating point errors were mentioned in a fairly recent Announcement about how Roblox was handling numbers.
I can’t remember which post it was, but maybe try searching Floating point error and search in the Announcements forum.

3 Likes

Also, when comparing float values with the equal operation you’ll have to use a small error of margin in your code. Example:

local A = 0.1 + 0.2
local B = 0.3
local err = 1e-6

print(math.abs(A - B) <= err)
1 Like

Since nobody ever mentions it, this is why it happens. In our number system, base 10, what is the answer to 1/3?
The answer is 0.3333333333 repeating infinitely. We don’t have infinite space on the paper, so let’s round it off at 5 decimal places.
0.33333
Multiply by 3 again and you get 0.99999. it’s not 1.
This is a similar rounding error that exists in our every day base 10 number system.
What’s more is that 1/3*2 and 2/3 are different numbers.
(1/3 = 0.33333) * 2 = 0.66666
2/3 = 0.66667

In binary or base 2, this type of error caused by numbers repeating infinitely is a lot more common. Like tape measures in Inches, binary numbers work best when dividing by 2. Halves, quarters, eighths, sixteenths, thirty-seconds, sixty-fourths, etc. If your number can’t be represented with these inverse powers of two, it must get rounded.

5 Likes

I think that’s the simplest way to do it, thank you, but I hope Roblox staff can handle it for us. We can just focus on game development and not focus on the details

so mathematically on a base 10 number system youre right. Computers use binary. This is the product of that. That value is what value the computer is using. It shouldnt matter what a human thinks it should be, what matters is what the value ACTUALLY is for the machine.

1 Like
function Round(Number, Digits)

local Num = Number * 10 ^ Digits

Num = Num>=0 and math.floor(Num+0.5) or math.ceil(Num-0.5)

Num = Num / (10 ^ Digits)

return Num

end

This method comes from @ rogeriodec_games, Should be built into Roblox as a friendly game engine

It is, math.round exists in Luau. You just need to handle the digit rounding:

local a = 0.13285358942
a = math.round(a * 1000) / 1000 --> 0.133
3 Likes

I really don’t think you understand how the floating point error happens and why it happens as a byproduct. Do some research on it and you will understand why they can’t just “fix” it.

You’re right, I don’t really know the deep reasons, because it’s boring to study it,I just want to make games with intuitive functions

1 Like

Your method is more concise, I decided to use your method in my game, thank you :grin:

1 Like


This is not just a double * double problem, it’s also a double * int problem.Sometimes, if we don’t pay attention to these details, it can have a big impact on our if-else logic

I would’ve done string.format('%.3f', a)

You can control the precision, plus you might be using stuff compiled from native C to perform the calculations.

I think the method you mentioned is really used a lot, and maybe the Roblox official want us to use this method to solve this problem, but I’m concerned about the performance, if I need real-time high-frequency calculation, for example, I’m shooting a monster, and I’m converting to string and then to double every time, Whether this performance cost is superfluous in the case of multiplayer online

1 Like

I have tested the string.format performance loss to be more than ten times the answer I adopted

local t = tick()
for i=1, 9999 do
	if tonumber(string.format('%.3f',0.1 + 0.2))==0.3 then
		
	end
end
print(tick() - t)

local t = tick()
for i=1, 9999 do
	if math.round((0.1+0.2)*1000)/1000==0.3 then
		
	end
end
print(tick() - t)

Above is the code I tested, and below is the output

When I tested your solution in studio, there was no change. The function float didn’t work

Oh! I was thinking you were trying to print the string represenation of the number and not much else. In that case, I would recommend changing 1000 to 1e3, or using math.abs(0.1+0.2-0.3)<1e-3

I ran this snippet:

local t = tick()
for i=1, 9999 do
	if math.round((0.1+0.2)*1000)/1000==0.3 then
		
	end
end
print(tick() - t)

local t = tick()
for i=1, 9999 do
	if math.abs(0.1+0.2-0.3)<1/1000 then
		
	end
end
print(tick() - t)
0.00030851364135742190 VS 0.00023102760314941406 
0.00030684471130371094 VS 0.00017261505126953125

Performance difference is not negligible, and I recommend using the latter as you’re including epsilon only once.

This method has been established as the de-facto for professional programmers everywhere.