All about Object Oriented Programming

Resources Community Tutorials
#57

When using OOP in a module script can I do something like this without the previous data being replaced?

local newTruck = Thing.new("Some name")
local newTruck2 = Thing.new("Some name v2")
#58

Yep. When you call Thing.new it makes a new object and all objects have their own separate set of variables. The only exception is what’s known as static variables where they are shared across all objects.

1 Like
#59

So you’re saying that Truck1’s and Truck2’s data will not be erased. And instead be separate?

#60

If your constructor is set up properly then their data will be separate and won’t be erased.

2 Likes
#63

I haven’t tried OOP with Lua yet, since most of my projects use a singleton format. So I’d have to ask: since OOP is becoming increasingly part and parcel to the Rōblox development scene, has someone yet written a library that simplifies class implementations?

My thoughts are that it could extend on the principle TypeScript uses to simplify constructors:

class foo {
constructor(name:string){}
}
#64

I did create an OOP library called “AntWorks” it’s very simple to use. [AntWorks - Object Oriented Library for rbxLua]

1 Like
#65

There are many libraries available however I’d advise you to consider the consequences of using a library before just diving in.

What I consider to be the main strength with this way of doing OOP in Lua is that is has no external dependencies. Once you have external dependencies you have to drag them around wherever your scripts go, you are locked into their way of doing things and it is more difficult to refactor later. This is not necessarily a bad thing if you don’t mind that, but it is important to consider. Make sure, if you accept these disadvantages, that the advantages are comparatively worth it.

Now there are a large range of libraries/tools available, from tiny little ones which just give you slightly cleaner syntax, large ones which automatically give you cool features such as reflection information and huge ones which completely transform the language!

One such library/tool which you might be interested in due to your mention of TypeScript is roblox-ts which effectively lets you use TypeScript in Roblox. It is still in development so it is advised to only use it for experimentation however it is quite amazing.

1 Like
#66

That’s why I couldn’t consider using larger dependencies (such as Roact) yet. One that creates a shortcut for initialising classes wouldn’t require a drastically new way of doing a major process. In fact, I had used to include a huge library of functions I made that took so long to prepare that it would time out before the actual script run.

Yes, I am aware of roblox.ts.

#67

There doesn’t seem to be an answer so I’ll post it:

Connections to object methods

I haven’t found an elegant way of handling this since the parameters passed by the connection are not related to the object itself, the simplest way I’ve come up with is to have an object method that returns a function, which is then connected to, like so:

function Obj:eat()
    return function()
        print("eated")
    end
end

local a = Obj.new()
a.Value.Changed:connect(a:eat())

Has anyone come up with a better way?

1 Like
#68

The way I’ve seen it done in other languages, is with a function called bind (see: Javascript Function.prototype.bind() and C++ std::bind()). In Lua a simple version could look something like this:

local function bind(method, obj)
	return function(...)
		return method(obj, ...)
	end
end

function Obj:eat()
	print("eated")
end

local a = Obj.new()
a.Value.Changed:connect(bind(Obj.eat, a))
4 Likes
#70

Wow, at first I was intimidated by OOP with all the metatables and everything. But then, after reading your thread, it cleared up some of my questions about it. Now, I truly see how this is super useful. I can’t wait to use it!

Thank you so much for taking your time to write this, it helps a lot! :smile:

5 Likes
#71

This tutorial was amazing. It helps to better understand OOP and now I use it often. Definitely recommend for anyone new to OOP.

Great tutorial!

2 Likes
#72

Thank you, I can finally flex on my friends with this new knowledge. :+1:

#74

THANK YOU :heart:
Thank you, this was very helpful. I already knew OOP from Java, though by just reading some scripts utilizing it I didn’t understand it. You were my rescue. Thanks, man.

1 Like
#75

This is super well explained however I don’t understand what do the 5th line in the last block of code. I tough the syntax was setmetatable(<table>, <metamethod>)

#76

… sets the meta-table of Truck to be the table Car which has its own meta-tables already defined.

OP describes this when they introduce a short description of meta-tables easier in the post:

In these examples, new instances of Car (such as newCar) and new classes that extend Car (such as Truck) will all use the meta-tables defined in Car.

1 Like
#77

Couldn’t find anything related to this:
How would you go about doing private properties?

#78

Private properties are only applicable to inheritance, and would be overkill in Lua.

Trust me, I’m the king of overkill. Eight years ago I made some pretty sophisticated OOP logic for Lua, and it was quite a challenge to figure out the best implementation.

3 Likes
#79

https://www.lua.org/pil/6.1.html
Closures, perhaps?

#80

How do I apply these technique to instance?