A lot of them already did after this, and a lot more did in the past before this post
If you are (quite understandably) paranoid about this false flagging players, simply make sure the namecall function can be retrieved properly and check the maximum call depth using pcall in a similar recursive function at the top of the script before using it in the second one. People have been using hacky CoreGui detection vectors for years now and if anything this is far more reliable.
Doesn’t make sense to use something as security then it gets breached in a matter of days or weeks.
People would place this in their game as some long-term or permanent alternative to combating exploits. They’d even use it now then months past when their game releases, this method would have been patched already and they’d have exploiters evading them.
Many companies like Google use AES which is a type of encryption method. If they expect that to be breached in a matter of months afterward then they wouldn’t use it.
You know you have no better argument when you have to compare an encryption algorithm such as AES to an exploit detection. You can claim client side checks are useless, yet all the top Roblox games often targeted by exploiters have implemented client-side anti cheats. In reality, most exploiters have no clue what they are running or how it works, and will be deterred by even the simplest checks.
Edit: you mention Google using AES, yet forget that their reCaptcha service uses obfuscation on client-facing javascript, performing the equivalent task as a client side anti cheat in our case.
LOL, did I compare it in any way?
Did you read what I said?
How did I compare an encryption method to an anti-exploit?
I literally said if Google used AES and it got breached in a matter of days or months afterward, and they KNEW it would be they wouldn’t use it.
The same argument goes for here
Doesn’t make sense to have something in your game PROTECTING IT if it’s gonna be breached in days or months.
The difference is encryption has to last forever or will become pointless in the future, while exploit detections only have to work until the player’s client closes and have no real consequences of failing to detect exploiters (at least over having no detection whatsoever).
Why are you comparing both of them then coming after me for it??
You still don’t get the point I’m saying:
1 Like
Of course it does. Would you rather have banned everyone who exploited your game this week, or have them all still playing?
1 Like
Yeah, but they have access to alts don’t they?
Access to VPNs, Virtual Machines, etc
So, what was the point of that statement?
Isn’t that the point of the exploit detection, it bans any account that injects.
My statement was this, am I right?
True, but it can still be used temporarily. Especially if the game is exploited regularly, they wouldn’t even see it coming when they join and immediately get banned after injecting.
Please refer to this reply I made on someone’s elses comment:
By this logic you are also saying server-side checks are pointless, and that kicks and bans in general are pointless. Roblox does not allow you to ban players by IP or HWID anyway so I don’t see why you would bring those up. Additionally if your game has saved items or stats, or costs Robux to play (such as Deepwoken which has a reputation for its strong anti cheat, and I believe also used the same detection I am giving out here) then bans become a much more effective punishment.
Edit: worth noting that Roblox itself has client side checks and preventions against exploit injections, which is one of the reasons it updates itself each week. If Roblox themselves use this strategy why shouldn’t you?
1 Like
The author does not intend for this to be a permanent solution. Most security solutions on Roblox are not permanent either, as Roblox updates and deprecates features.
This is a temporary but good tool to take offensive action against exploiters, it won’t remove them in the long run, but it will punish those in the present.
LOL, WHEN DID I SAY THAT.
Your logic is off the roof, I didn’t even have to read more of it.
I’m saying they can use other methods to exploit that same game.
Exactly, the author did not intend it to be permanent thus he intended it to be a temp solution like Roblox, do you really think their fixes lasts for long or is permanent? No. Ok, maybe rarely but it’s also good to make exploiters tired
As I said before, please refer to my first post on this topic. I won’t repeat myself if it’s already there, then end up in a loop.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m NOT disagreeing with you. It is good to remove them now but personally, I don’t think it’s a good deal if it’s gonna get patched.
Everyone has the choice to use this if they want to, I can’t tell someone to not use it.
So Roblox patching exploits for a while is bad? cool post man.
2 Likes
You can’t exploit if you cannot even inject. For now, there aren’t any other methods. It would be up to the creators of the injection programs to bypass it by rewriting their program. Honestly, I don’t even see why you are arguing, this is a functioning resource. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to use it.
1 Like