Making my anticheat work in vehicles and on parts with velocity

[dthecoolest]

Yeah nvm, my idea for a server authoritative model I don’t think it’s a good idea it would require a lot of server to client communication in order to rubber band the local vehicle and I just found out that the exploiter can of course spoof it on the client-side video on it by Sleitnick especially with the fact that we can’t control physics replication that well.

I’ve asked this question before in this post and I didn’t fully understand why it shouldn’t work with Roblox’s model until the above video for my idea.

Authoritarian server model for a locally controlled constraint Vehicle

Adding RemoteEvent/RemoteFunction into the equation is just another avenue for an exploiter to, well, exploit. Your best bet is to do server-side sanity checks on the vehicles position to make sure it’s not doing anything out of the ordinary (going through important walls, spinning uncontrollably, hovering, etc). Determining what is “out of the ordinary” is, and always has been, kinda tough to solve, and ultimately different for every game.

For this question.

@Crystalflxme

If the driver’s speed is being monitored, you wouldn’t have to bother with the player’s speeds in the car, right?

Yeah, the passenger has no control over the physics of the vehicle. Edit: but they may have control over the physics of other BaseParts like a tool which causes the FE fling exploit so yeah be wary of that as well.

@Crystalflxme

Anyways, do you think the vehicle checks would work considering what a cheater could do with network ownership of a vehicle?

For this question at this point sanity checks are our best option given the tools we have though I’m not that experienced but that’s how it seems based on my research regarding replication tools and stuff.