Awesome update!
Absolutely love this change, way easier to test things now without users following
3 Likes
Please. More Develop page changes. 
Definitely an interesting feature that will improve how players develop.
Now, will this allow me to whitelist other users as well? That’s a big thing.
2 Likes
Great change!
Sounds like it
4 Likes
Had it just been a name change, I’d say it makes it even more confusing. When you think of private games, it’s still playable, but just by you.
Then I realized that you are looking into making players able to test private games, so my concern is gone.
This is great, I can’t wait until the second part of this update comes, where you can test inactive games privately.
Question: Would it be possible to set it private to a group of people? If not, how would this work for group games? I can see this being really useful for private testing.
2 Likes
Looking good 
YES 
Amazing update on inactive (or should I say "Private) places, very much needed!
I was skeptical about it, since I figured it was just going to be a bit pointless, until I noticed you can play even when it’s private, which is actually a really nice change after a second’s thought!
Place visits to Game sessions next?
The term “place visit” is very confusing…
1 Like
I agree that the concept of “place visits” no longer makes sense. We will probably change it to “plays” at some point.
10 Likes
I think you guys just need to worry about giving us a better way to show we updated the game!
Sounds like a step in the right direction!
I’d also love to see the ability to sort all your public places, not just the games.
This is a nice change! It certainly makes it more clear.
local RS=game:GetService("RunService")
RS.RenderStepped:connect(function()
print("THANK YOU! YES! :D")
end)
*whether 
I hate this update.
jk. I love this update. Thanks!
Glad we’re going to be able to test updates with private mode, it’s going to make life a lot easier!