AI engineers will agree that:
General-purpose models like GPT-4.1 or Claude are trained broadly across many programming languages, frameworks, and problem types. Their SWE benchmark scores (e.g., 70%) reflect a wide average across that broad scope, not deep specialization. BulletMindV1 no longer wastes capacity on irrelevant domains like Java Spring Boot or CUDA kernels.
Domain-specific models like the BulletMindV1 can easily outperform generalist models within their niche. Which is why it’s easily able to reach 90%+ SWE tasks for Roblox-specific tasks but will absolutely lose its skill to do any other programming language but Roblox Lua.
My question then is why wouldn’t you wait for the formal research paper to be published and reviewed before making the claims that you do in the documentation? The issue I raised was the fact this research isn’t public and available to read alongside the benchmarks, so as it stands, we have no way of verifying whether your current claims are true or not.
RAGs aren’t immutable. A RAG is literally the use of an LLM with external knowledge base retrieval. They absolutely can be “fed” new information via dynamic indexing, index updates, manually adding data to the knowledge base. One of the main draws of using a RAG system is having direct access to the sources being used to generate responses. Thats literally the entire point of it as opposed to a static fine-tuned model. What do you mean by “it’s not possible to feed RAG system”?
Not tryin to defend these corporate powerhouses of course, but using them as frame of reference when they at least provide some information regarding how and where your data is being handled feels a bit dishonest.
I’m unsure if you understand what I’m saying here. Neither the payment processors or analytics services are explicitly referenced. I was saying that Google (and by extension Roblox, as its obviously given) is the only one mentioned by name. What are the analytic services and payment processors being used?
AI should only be a tool that assists and accelerates development, not completely replaces humans. This tool tries to do exactly that, completely replaces humans in the process.
the UI doesn’t look good and overall looks like it wae vibe coded. having ai making everything sounds like a disaster, and most people can tell when things are ai. i feel like you would not be creative with this at all.
Ethics aside, this doesn’t really remove barriers, in fact it creates a barrier where people are over reliant and when they try to make a game without ai, they won’t be able to do it without having to learn about coding plus, what about when this program gets discontinued
The current UI definitely leans more toward functional than polished. But that’s by design: SuperbulletAI is meant to get you from idea to prototype fast. bOf course, for anyone serious about launching, bringing in a proper HUMAN UI designer to polish is key as the AI’s UI output is editable, not locked.
Calculators didn’t stop people from learning math, this helps more people start building. It just is the future. Sooner or later, there will be another tool like this even if we’re the first to release or not.
This is a poor comparison. Calculators acted as a tool that only served to assist the user in doing maths, especially complex maths on their own. They still required the human to actually do all the work figuring out things like what formulas, inputs, etc… to plug into them. Your “tool” does nothing but do the entire process for them with nearly no human input at all which can hardly be considered a real tool.
Anyways, I avoid OOP like the plague and would prefer to use functional and procedural programming instead, would that be supported?
I was wondering if the AI can make UI? and Build as well? that’s incredible
Anyways don’t listen to these people having a meltdown over AI, what you created here is nothing short but amazing so don’t let their opinion get to you
The AI is very helpful in building UI and when it comes to building, it’s pretty limited right now.
Big thanks!
I don’t really understand why everyone is having a meltdown over AI, when it can teach people to program better than if they were to teach themselves. If “overreliance” is the concern, overreliance on AI can be easily solved by simply not over relying on it. There are only around 3,000–5,000 Roblox developers in the world who are truly proficient in Roblox Lua. That’s how scarce it is. Everyone else is either an amateur at scripting or, even after 3–4 years, they only reach an intermediate level-which is where most of the 2.5 million active developers on Roblox are. To a point where my team needs to launch workshops around the globe to teach Roblox programming.
Who does not use AI to their lives anymore? I’m sure as a Roblox programmer, they have used it to research 10x faster rather than reading 20 articles before you get the info you need.
The conclusion I drew’s that this is a tool shock. This is just the reaction to fast change. Every major tech leap causes it. StackOverflow was seen as cheating, and Roblox’s equivalent is DevForum - which would have been seen “cheating” back 2008-2013. Google was seen as lazy back 2006-2010 compared to reading the programming manual of programming languages, but now everyone uses Google. Again, emphasing I’m a self-taught programmer - I would have not learned programming without Google and DevForum too.
AI is not strong enough to not be guided by humans. Reiteration is done by humans.
If you put it from that perspective, then this is a tool too. It requires a human to actually do all the work. Still requires human to figure out things like game design, securty, hiring team members, managing budgets, post-updates, etc.
biggest problem in my eyes is the ai folding in on itself
since it learned from already existing human programmers, what happens when it starts learning from itself when at some point in time (hopefully never) people get fully replaced with ai?
this is already seen in image-generating ai, where the quality gradually decreases as slop gets trained on slop.
ai as a full on one-click-game-maker is a short term solution for problems that can be solved with simple patience and glory of actually learning luau…
best solution (as like, every single person here stated) is to make it a programming assistant rather than replacer. we are talking about scripting here, not other things like game design or funds.
We have had these initiatives if people have just read the roadmap. It’s soon to roll out to many countries as fast as possible in early 2026.
In fact, by end of August, there will be a launch of an LLM in SuperbulletAI that will teach people 10x better in programming than Roblox’s AI. With the 1M free tokens per month, 60x less inference cost and how it teaches programming overall just way better with best practices and industry standard, it will be the state-of-the-art for learning Roblox programming and 1M free tokens feels unlimited you don’t even need to buy a plan to be a master.
What we’re building at SuperbulletAI is gold, a free opportunity for people of all ages to make their own Roblox games. AI will never be powerful enough to build complete Roblox experiences without human guidance. Not the AI we have today, and if a future AI ever reaches that point, it would be such a different kind of technology that everything we’ve built would be obsolete anyway. I’m not destroying careers, there were barely careers here to begin with on Roblox. People who ever made it made it, they’re millionaires now that they don’t care about teaching. That is why most programmers are still amateurs, even with ChatGPT and countless resources available compared to years ago.
In truth, I earned a lot on the platform as well. $$$K. And I can’t emphasize this enough, I programmed manually myself and I know the struggle.
We’re not here to replace anyone, we’re here to fix the gap and give more people the chance to become real Roblox creators.
AI will destroy the world. Not by it going evil, because its a big contributor for climate change. Also that looks very suspicious as it takes data from your games. Thats basically spyware. Also, why should i use your product? What proof is here that its the best?
