Nope, sorry I dont meant that. No saying that your original post has loose ends, what I mean is that @AMisspelledUsernaem code is trying to avoid loose ends that OP could have on their side. It was just a compliment to @bleh on the effort of trying to avoid if OP is confused on the approach.
Your code worked perfectly for me on first try, and I think thats the solution in brief words.
I tried to state that your approach worked perfect for me when I said this:
Thats all.