This is honestly so true. Roblox does not care about anyone’s opinion.
12 Likes
Accurate, they just force something on us instead of REALLY caring for the community.
11 Likes
swap to classic head in the inventory
8 Likes
They are 100% not going to reply to any negative feedback, they turn a blind eye, i’m actually growing very sick of this platform and what it is becoming and i don’t think i’m the only one.
17 Likes
I think the DevForum is starting to break with how many responses people are sending here within such a short amount of time.
Honestly, I think why people are so angry about this isn’t mainly because of Roblox updating dynamic heads itself, but placing the cheaper classic faces off sale to encourage users to use dynamic heads. Dynamic heads are still an optional thing.
13 Likes
I want to know how much Roblox estimated they’d lose by letting classic faces and dynamic heads coexist
12 Likes
I just don’t see the point of this, im not going to set up a webcam, let roblox record my face just for an animated face that most people wont look at.
10 Likes
There are multiple examples of Roblox updates that have been hated initially but have since been ignored or accepted by the community.
- The entire “oof” sound effect being removed was a HUGE drama among the community, but I’ve never heard anyone mention it nowadays.
- Rthro was seen as the “end of Roblox” several years ago, yet the sale of Rthro-technology items, such as layered clothing, is becoming more widespread
- People didn’t like display names when they came out, but today there’s been little concern or anger among the community about them
Of course, some changes, like the audio privacy and cheap UGC items, continue to be discussed, but for an update like this, it’ll be accepted more or less within a few months.
3 Likes
Don’t think anything much would change? Roblox is trying to hide their past with more “modern” technology, I guess.
4 Likes
It’s not even negative, the replies in the item holding thread were made by actual veteran developers or serious traders but roblox refused to respond, unless they’re shareholders.
7 Likes
the problem here is roblox doesnt need the consent of the community, and even if they did I highly doubt they would take that in to consideration. It’s like if i saw someone doing something stupid that could lead to something bad happening. I’d just let them deal with the consequences. Will they learn? probably not. Do I care? Not really, they played stupid games and won stupid prizes.
5 Likes
Anyone figure out how many head options there are now for new users without much roblox?
1 Like
That’s because everyone realizes now there is no way to shift Roblox’s decision.
8 Likes
We will continue to evolve and move forward
3 Likes
wait they’re named by the year they released and not the number of individual limbs???
3 Likes
hopefully not, as i said, there should be an AI moderation that will have people saying having facial expressions is not worth it, same way like Voice Chat, else that will be terrible
2 Likes
no way…
guys, unrelated, but guess what happened
THEY FORCED RTHRO ON DEFAULT AVATARS
It even comes with a dynamic face…
13 Likes
They acknowledged it to me internally, but that’s been the extent of it AFAIK. I have no clue if it’s still planned.
1 Like
this is an obvious troll post, everyone knows they’re named after the amount of limbs
4 Likes
It’s named by the amount of limbs, R6 having 6 limbs, R15 having 15 limbs.
4 Likes