Adding and removing bases on the client!

Help and Feedback Scripting Support
#1

So im trying to reduce lag by adding a section to settings where you can remove other players bases… However I am not sure how to put them back…

Code:

wait(4)

local base = game.Players.LocalPlayer.PlayersBase.Value
local base1 = game.Workspace.Base1
local base2 = game.Workspace.Base2
local base3 = game.Workspace.Base3
local base4 = game.Workspace.Base4

script.RemoveBases.Event:connect(function()
	if base ~= base1 then
		base1:Destroy()
	end
	if base ~= base2 then
		base2:Destroy()
	end
	if base ~= base3 then
		base3:Destroy()
	end
	if base ~= base4 then
		base4:Destroy()
	end
end)

script.Add.Event:connect(function()
	local bases = game.ReplicatedStorage.GetBases:InvokeServer()
	local base1v = bases.Base1
	local base2v = bases.Base2
	local base3v = bases.Base3
	local base4v = bases.Base4
	if base ~= base1v then
		base1v:Clone().Parent = workspace
	end
	if base ~= base2v then
		base2v:Clone().Parent = workspace
	end
	if base ~= base3v then
		base3v:Clone().Parent = workspace
	end
	if base ~= base4v then
		base4v:Clone().Parent = workspace
	end
end)

Please let me know how I could do this, thanks! :smiley:

#2

You can just store the locations of the bases before you remove them and then just move the base back to that stored location when you are adding them back.

#3

well if a players adds something to their base it will not add it for you.

1 Like
#4

Since you are using a remote function to get the bases, why don’t you just return the location of the base?

1 Like
#5

what if the player adds something to their base… it will not update it for you.

1 Like
#6

That’s a whole another issue. I’m trying to help with simply placing the base back. Try firing a remote event to update the other bases that are currently being shown whenever a base is updated. I think there’s a better way of doing it but you can at least try it. :confused:

1 Like
#7

would putting the base in something like replicated storage lower lag?

1 Like
#8

It could lower FPS lag (not entirely sure) as it is not being rendered anymore, but it would still use the same amount of memory i think.

#9

does using memory cause lag?

1 Like
#10

I dont think memory usage directly causes lag, it really just depends on the base size, the amount of parts, unions etc

1 Like
#11

is there a place I could put it where it would not use both?

#12

Deleting it would remove it from memory, like you originally tried

Im not sure how you would go about temporarily removing the base and then reviving it though

#13

ok im putting it in replicated storage. should help a bit.

1 Like