fr like i dont see anyone saying it is non functional except bro just straight glazing citadel even though theres no code or anything provided from them except some videos from months ago
2 Likes
Then just wait for the new public test build to release today (probably today maybe tmr) and test it out yourself?
Ah, I checked if it worked in the studio command bar but not the LocalScript. Here’s the fix. It’s only one line.
Update 1.2.1
- Fixed random error
Release:
Visionary Anti Cheat.rbxm (34.4 KB)
Also another thing, how do I use this together with Adonis? It seems to detect Adonis functions and things, I tried to exclude it but it still detects it.
It detects me when I try to close adonis’s notification.
Okay, I disabled Anti_Remove_Objects and it seems to be okay now.
Are you planning to add player whitelist so we can whitelist staffs?
1 Like
Hopefully in the future, but exploiters can manipulate the player whitelist to pretend to be a staff member to bypass the anticheat.
1 Like
Amazing anticheat detecting adonis as a cheat
this is so fire
Your better off using likers anticheat methods thread lol
Hey, good work on this resource man, i’ll try implementing it into my FPS game when i can.
1 Like
Update 1.2.2
- Fixed crash relating to Adonis Anticheat deleting random things that Visionary detected.
Release:
Visionary Anti Cheat.rbxm (34.3 KB)
1 Like
If you count turning strings into base64 and adding cflow as obfuscation you may need to seek help from your local chatgpt
1 Like
by definition if you are using any technique to make your code unreadable, it’s called obfuscation 
but i guess chatgpt is right, actual obfuscation is pasting ironbrew and slapping divine code onto it, lol!
1 Like
By that definition just having a godawful coding style would be considered obfuscation due to how annoying it would be to read
yeah those tables are not there cause of the uglifier i specifically put them there
the onlything the uglifier added was base64 and cflow on this image
This comment was a fallacy in it’s own! 
A person who’s code is really bad is easily differentiable from code which is obfuscated. 
Which doesn’t even matter, because 
by definition 
obfuscation is intentfully making code harder to read. 
I’ve never heard of a programmer manually encoding his own strings in base64 just because it’s his coding style, but that might be only me tho. 
2 Likes
wouldnt obfuscation imply there is some security behind it i dont see a easily reverseable encoding such as base 64 and nested if statements adding any security
as stated by geekforgeeks
“It is mainly done for the purposes of security”
and techtarget
“Programming code is often obfuscated to protect intellectual property or trade secrets, and to prevent an attacker from reverse engineering a proprietary software program.”
i see no security addition in a basic base64 encoding and if statement nesting
sure YOU can consider it as obfuscation but it isnt classified as such in 99.9% of cases
Next to the definition of obscuring your code, it is true that obfuscation also implies security. However, your reasoning is still completely wrong. The fact that it is reversable, makes even the “easiest” form of security, still security. Emphasis on “easy” being a subjective term.
Also stop spreading lies, any form of obfuscation is a security addition without relying on the intensity of it. For context, open your ironbrew fork and open the folder “Obfuscation”, you’ll see two folders parented to it; “Encryption” and “Control Flow”. Without discussing the level of intensity of these techniques, they are still obfuscation techniques.
I’m not coming after your intelligence nor skills in this field, but you should not be discussing the meaning of a linguistic term, as you have no clue lol but WHATEVER FLOATS YOUR BOAT BUDDY!
1 Like