A good save instance is impossible to detect without kernel
Why did you inject wave on main and is it still detected now
bro i could detect solara with my toes its not that hard
I’m just gonna come to the conclusion that you are just some troll and rage baiter. I’m no longer interacting with you.
If you really are who you say to be (unlikely), you are embarrassing.
the video is old before i cared for banwaves and yes the method in that video still works
Hello, dear sir.
Your opinion is noted, but this will not change the fact that Visionary is non-functional. You are better off using Likers’ anti-cheat methods thread for security than this.
Good day.
why are people starting arguments without even reading any comments or codes?
fr like i dont see anyone saying it is non functional except bro just straight glazing citadel even though theres no code or anything provided from them except some videos from months ago
Then just wait for the new public test build to release today (probably today maybe tmr) and test it out yourself?
Ah, I checked if it worked in the studio command bar but not the LocalScript. Here’s the fix. It’s only one line.
Update 1.2.1
- Fixed random error
Release:
Visionary Anti Cheat.rbxm (34.4 KB)
Also another thing, how do I use this together with Adonis? It seems to detect Adonis functions and things, I tried to exclude it but it still detects it.
It detects me when I try to close adonis’s notification.
Okay, I disabled Anti_Remove_Objects and it seems to be okay now.
Are you planning to add player whitelist so we can whitelist staffs?
Hopefully in the future, but exploiters can manipulate the player whitelist to pretend to be a staff member to bypass the anticheat.
Amazing anticheat detecting adonis as a cheat
this is so fire
Your better off using likers anticheat methods thread lol
Hey, good work on this resource man, i’ll try implementing it into my FPS game when i can.
Update 1.2.2
- Fixed crash relating to Adonis Anticheat deleting random things that Visionary detected.
Release:
Visionary Anti Cheat.rbxm (34.3 KB)
Greetings 77,
I want to comment that this statement is very false and misleading. Uglification is rather known as a subset of obfuscation, indicating that both these terms share the same objective. By definition, uglification does qualify to be called obfuscation, and so is mentioning “deobfuscation” in this scenario correct.
I mean no harm to the 77 industry but I do think righteous behavior should be upheld in this place of professionalism.
Good day.