I’m currently having the following issue:
X.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
Y.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
Z.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
...
Is there a better way of doing this?
I’m currently having the following issue:
X.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
Y.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
Z.Triggered:Connect(function()
..
end)
...
Is there a better way of doing this?
function something()
return
end
X.Triggered:Connect(something)
Y.Triggered:Connect(something)
Z.Triggered:Connect(something)
Providing the connected functions are all the same, if they’re not you can just use conditionals inside the definition of the function itself to differentiate between triggered elements.
Uh that doesn’t really work for me because I have to check if one of many values gets changed.
This should answer your question.
The code you provided is not an issue, there’s nothing wrong in doing that.
However, take a look at the link I provided above, it mainly depends on preference.
Too many events will not damage performance. Just make sure to disconnect them when they are no longer needed, if they once will be no longer needed.
It’s an idea more than anything, if all functions have a common base, but change something small, like an instance, you can do something like this
function Connect(String, Number)
return function()
print(String, Number)
end
end
X.Triggered:Connect(Connect("X", 12))
Y.Triggered:Connect(Connect("Y", 1))
Z.Triggered:Connect(Connect("Z", 6))
instead of this
X.Triggered:Connect(function()
print("X", 12)
end)
Y.Triggered:Connect(function()
print("Y", 1)
end)
Z.Triggered:Connect(function()
print("Z", 6)
end)
local stuff = {X, Y, Z}
local function e()
print("e")
end
for i, v in ipairs(stuff) do
stuff.Triggered:Connect(e)
end