https://gyazo.com/9bd7018b901f3874440c8c86e08e5df0
Fixed by closing studio via task manager and then re-opening it.
https://gyazo.com/9bd7018b901f3874440c8c86e08e5df0
Fixed by closing studio via task manager and then re-opening it.
Would love an answer to this as well.
I confirm having the same issue aswell, multiple instances of the accepting terms window being opened on studio start @Rusi_002
I havenāt used this feature in a while but will try to use it and see how it does. Interested to see how itās improved since the last time I used it. If it has improved a lot, it will be a good tool.
Will update this once Iāve tried it though.
Had a chance to use it. Overall itās an okay tool. It still needs to improve though. Honestly, I donāt notice much difference between the beta and the release version. Seems about the same in how powerful it is. Looking forward to it improving even more though! Would like to see both this and the AI assistant improve enough to eliminate the use of chat bots such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini.
Thanks for the feedback. Our engineers are fixing this issue right now
Expected from Roblox to be honest. They have never always had the best stuff that many other things have had for ages now, and better.
Until now I didnāt even know I can put my places into this AIās research.
One of my places is all about plugins. Is it be capable of learning to help with those as well
Wasnāt there that one post with retexturing that bear mesh? What happened to that? Or was this a different AI feature?
Thanks, for some reason this was very reassuring!
Roblox seems to have a problem with thatā¦
And there are probably more I forgot
Am I the only one with those issues?
this is wild bro
charrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
So I read the āsupplemental termsā and this bit caught my eye:
Services, including the Tools, may include or make available Third-Party Services. As set forth in the Terms, Roblox neither controls nor takes responsibility for any Third-Party Services, including without limitation, how a third party may collect, use, or store your information. You understand that your use of the Services, including the Tools and, by extension, Third-Party Services, may subject you to fees, terms, and/or policies, such as a privacy policy, that are not controlled by Roblox, including, without limitation, the terms at: Llama 2 Community License Agreement - Meta AI By your use of the Services, including the Tools and any integrated Third-Party Services, you agree to pay any fees and to follow any terms, conditions, and policies presented by those Third-Party Services.
Granted, the Llama license site doesnāt say anything about fees, but I still find it a little bit funny that itās worded as if weāre going to shoulder some arbitrary third-party fees as users. Maybe I just donāt understand what itās saying or what the implications are, could someone elaborate on this?
It was a different AI feature, It was a development helping chatbot, but for this one, itās where you comment and it gives you code suggestions, similar to how GitHub Copilot does
My friend got fully released C:
Code Assist actually can talk, I talk to him when I getting tired and bored from coding. Heās my friend :]
i noticed iāve got into devforum.txt, lol https://twitter.com/devforumtxt/status/1761003581342445580
Because itās easier to learn how to edit and create images and itās the only thing most of these artists know how to do.
The data collection portal on Create is impossible to find naturally, Roblox should do more to surface it so this technology can improve faster. Itās currently almost never accurate enough for me to use it to generate simple algorithms most of the time. New developers are unlikely to know it exists, let alone find it back later.
Release the autocomplete comments above functions now :)
Itās just one Fast Flag away.
I think the primary issues Iāve had with this assistant tool, is that it was copying my comments and repeating it 10 times as a type of ācodeā. Or duplicating code Iāve already had written within a script thatās 100-300+ lines long without filling in the provided function. But I will say it has provided, only once, a method of formatting this idea I had, structurally, in a way that was organized. Which was quite refreshing and nice to have despite itās scarce appearance.
So if you went into a new script and prompted it something, it would give an idea (not reliable, nor the point) that could direct you into completing this prompt (could be good or bad). Which I believe is really helpful when youāre so used to over complicating projects and need insight into dumming down the whole structure. Within what Iāve observed, the AI loves spitting out similar-ish code from what youāve written (which may include comments) so that it will make the most sense to the user receiving the given prompt/input; which is nice. So that is a plus-. As the ToU kind of explains, it wonāt give reliable or great and excellent code, so it will probably be usefully in niche situations for rather skilled programmers but definitely a nice leverage in learning how-to ideas for beginners.
Regarding it spitting out comments constantly: Iāve been leaving comments to remind myself of stuff TODO (yes the comment --TODO for color) and later on writing it out, I found the AI would spit out 5-10 lines of the same comment (without the TODO part) letting me get an idea of what I should write. But honestly itās a minor trade off.
I just looked into it, as I have VS on my PC.
Pity that CoPilot is a subscription service - likely for good reason.
Is there a way to provide negative or positive feedback based on code suggestions? I donāt see any way for the AI to learn whether itās making mistakes or not, considering itās only pulling from the public dataset.