Feedback on a render

Hello!
I’ve worked on a render and I wanted some feedback on it.
I wanted to know how much should I pay for a render and what I could do to fix it and make it better.

1 Like

FEEDBACK

Its not bad at all, I think your photoshoping skills are basic as I am guessing you did add a Background in Photoshop and Rendered the Models with a Transparent Background, The lighting is basic too. You should try adding more effects for reflection, If using Cinema 4D, You could use GGX to the models as a reflection to give it a Shiny Reflective look.

PRICE

You should charge between 200 - 350, Once you feel you have become better, You could increase your price.

I actually rendered everything through blender, Here is the render that I did and the picture posted above in the post is everything after I edited it through Photoshop a bit.

1 Like

Ah, Alright, I would recommend you moving to Blender 2.8 as the Rendering is way better there and there are many upgrades in the lighting. You could also add a Lens Flare where you think there should be a light emission so that it looks more aesthetic too. Great work on the Earth Glow and Saturation in Photoshop.

Hello there @Floxylak.

You’ve done a good job on this render, but in my opinion it looks a bit too basic and empty.
I personally have never made any renders, but i could tell there is a lot of room for improvement in this render.

As @OfficiallySpo_oky stated above, the lighting and effects are the key, if you start working on them more and apply some better effects. It would for sure give an overall better looking to this render.

Keep up the great work. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

I’m currently stuck with an older version of blender as my PC doesn’t support much of the newer versions. I would’ve made better lightning with that. I’m currently using 2.76 which doesn’t support much…

I’ll definitely be upgrading my PC in the future if possible and upgrading my work to the better though!
I’m not sure if I can fix the lightning to the better with my current version though (2.76).