Im not sure what kind of photo editting software you used or perhaps you went through every AI detector until you could find something. In any case, your credibility is diminished.
Thank you for addressing my least important claim, I appreciate it a lot! I use gptzero to check if text is written by AI. And I would like you to know that AI’s response is something you can’t calculate mathematically or something. In the many screenshots you’ve gotten a variety of numbers, proving that it honestly depends on the AI.
I could say the same for you as proven by the claim above. And no, I just use gptzero because that’s the one my school mainly uses. How I’m to blame for what AI tells me isn’t understandable and I would love a follow up on that.
Premium Vector | 1970 rainbow flower hippie style vector isolated illustration
Mhm. All He did was screenshot it, and remove the watermarks.
2 Likes
You often use AI and then change some of the wording or intentionally misspell some of the words to throw off detectors. It is painfully obvious for anyone who has experience with LLMs like me.
You also intentionally make inflammatory titles or use other forms of clickbait or ragebait to get attention. You plagiarize other people’s work without credit. You create topics solely with the purpose to create drama and farm attention.
Please stop.
1 Like
Is that the only thing you have to say to everything that bro responded with? Thats insane tbh
i would put coefficients here but im too lazy
1 Like
Truthfully, I didnt use ai to write it.
Its interesting to hear your experience with LLM. Can you tell me what aspects of my speech give the impression of ai?
If its just because i use rhetorical strategies like appealing to pathos or anaphora [repetition of words], etc then thats just because I take AP Lang.
Also purposely mispelling words doesnt really trip the detectors since they go based on common ai phrasing and words.
So what impressions of my speech make you think I use ai, considering your LLM experience?
His interaction with this post is illogical. His tendancies suggest he simply wants to engage in toxic discourse. Specific things such as naming are trivial to the importance of my tool. If he truely wants me to engage with him he should discuss suggestions for my tool’s functionality, with an understanding of my tools intended purpose. He does things like compare my asset to google’s color wheel.
I have better things to do than spend my energy adressing such trivial aspects.
This seems more like your not willing to take criticism for the things you create. He doesn’t seem like he wants to engage in “toxic discourse” but more so point out your VERY obvious flaws. If someone pointing out your flaws seems toxic, then I don’t think your mindset is very good.
Nonetheless, don’t take this message as “toxic” or whatnot. I’m simply trying to criticize your flaws. I’m sure many people will love this, but considering the flaws in this post (and your track record with other posts) you’ll probably deter others who are actually willing to use this.
Remember that this reply isn’t to try and hate on you. I wish you the best on any topics that you create later on!
Dude you dont even know what my post is about, how can you possibly point out any “very obvious flaws” in the assets design. You literally called it a plugin
Its a free model asset not a plugin
mb for the plugin typo lol completely ignore that was there
There are still flaws though. For example:
- It is not “The best COLOR wheel on ROBLOX”.
- You do not give much information about it other than the videos. (very small flaw since the videos do practically tell you everything, but still a flaw)
- It does not provide “unprecedented detail”. It isn’t much different compared to Studio’s color wheel.
- It is not more than color. It is just color.
- It is not “Color. Perfected.”
Nonetheless it’s still a cool idea
Many of your messages use similar word choice, phrasing, and general sentence structure that is common with AI. There is no one way to tell, but I’ve worked with using and fine tuning a range of AI models to know what to look for.
Not to mention you have admitted to using AI in the past (I’ll look for those messages but you may have deleted them)
It has nothing to do with your rhetorical skills
Yes it does. AI models don’t misspell which will trip up AI detectors which compare the text to a corpus of AI generated text.
Just ignore him, he’s trying to get others to bump his topic. If he continues and nobody is talking flag for bumping.
2 Likes
Bro literally copied the same slogan from his weather one that was -
Its more than Weather. It’s an experience.
For this one, I’d reccomend
Its more than Color. It’s an pattern.
I like that slogan but I did " It’s more than Color. Its Gods Color." Because of my branding strategy. And yea I re-used some stuff like the formatting but at least its not ai. I think its just easier than rewriting a whole post
1 Like
you forgot to make the model public
1 Like
you know what else is a pattern?
op’s clickbait and ai generated posts and tools.
Dissing aside, this tool is not the first of its kind…
There’s already tons of color pickers out there that you can integrate into your Roblox games, and some of them have cleaner code than this…
Also, I’d be careful if I were you all. Half of this guy’s replies are also AI generated.
“these androids. can’t even tell who’s human or not anymore.”
3 Likes
Branding strategy on the devforum is crazy
3 Likes
Thanks for the feedback. Gods color is the first color picker I’ve made. Thanks.
Even toxic replies help! They bump the post.
Oops thanks for letting me know. It should be public now