Https://inventory.roblox.com/v2/assets Does not return a owner list for Roblox created pure "2.0" Limiteds

[VAC9]

Unlike 1.0 Limited’s where a request to https://inventory.roblox.com/v2/assets would return a list of owners, this feature does not work with Roblox Created 2.0 Limited’s that never were a “1.0” limited.

Here is the output for Vlad the Impaler, IV - Roblox

Here is the output for Gold Clockwork Headphones - Roblox a limited that was never on the 1.0 structure:

Expected behavior

I believe that this API’s Intended behavior should send back information for Roblox created items pushed limited However since the 2.0 structure is newer this might have been missed.

If there is any new API for this for 2.0 limited assets please let me know.

[starhiker13]

Thank you for the report. This is an acknowledgement message. We have assigned to our team for further review.

[VAC9]

All items with serials are now returning with “Null” in this API for them as of a few moments ago.

[VAC9]

Update:

I have created a separate report for the bug above as its bigger then i thought it was.

Https://inventory.roblox.com/v2/assets Returning bad info in API

Awhile ago Https://inventory.roblox.com/v2/assets Started returning bad/faulty information about items Example: Hooded Spacelord - Roblox is saying there are no serials in the API despite being a serialized item [image] Items that originally did not have serials are also returning bad information Examples: The Classic ROBLOX Fedora - Roblox [image] The API is returning that this item has serials despite not having any. Expected behavior The api should not be sending faulty info

[VAC9]

This seems to have been fixed now so now it’s only this issue that still exists with the api.

[VAC9]

This post has been marked as resolved yet the assets page still returns a {“errors”:[{“code”:2,“message”:“You do not have permission to view the owners of this asset.”,“userFacingMessage”:“Something went wrong”}]} on Gold Clockwork Headphones which is not uniform to other Limited’s. @starhiker13 could we get a rereview?

[VAC9]

Hey just coming back to say this issue seems to have been fixed! Thanks so much for putting support for new 2.0 items in the API! if any issues arise i will post here or create a new thread