a={}
for a.i = 1, 10 do
end
Workaround
a={}
for i = 1, 10 do
a.i = i
end
I don’t see the point in not being able to directly use a table element as a counter in the for loop.
a={}
for a.i = 1, 10 do
end
a={}
for i = 1, 10 do
a.i = i
end
I don’t see the point in not being able to directly use a table element as a counter in the for loop.
This doesn’t seem like a bug as it doesn’t look like supported syntax; I think it would be better to file an RFC for this. (RFC Guide)
Hello rogeriodec_games,
This isn’t a bug, we don’t support this kind of syntax. I also cannot see us implementing something like this–this kind of side effect is non-obvious especially compared to the workaround code.
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.