In response to the 'oof' sound discussion

Sort of Yes and Sort of no. It depends on the situation if Tommy intentionally tried to spread false information to damage Roblox’s image, they may have a case for slander. However, this post doesn’t provide credible evidence to fully prove Roblox Corporation’s innocence in this case and more or so just a PR Statement trying to try to give their position. (Like for instance, It’s perfectly possible that the creator of that supposed royalty-free CD-ROM didn’t get permission from Tommy to distribute the “OOF” Sound Effect.)

Editors Note: As you can expect Tommy responded as he should have to deny that statement entirely and telling the public that the CD-ROM Theory I had was correct. And as I said, this doesn’t mean anyone is in the right or wrong yet, it’s just mainly messages from both sides of the story with really no real evidence other then the meta data in the audio being publicly known. (if there’s going to be a legal case, all of that would be in the lawsuit form from the courts.)

12 Likes