Is there anyway to Tween Transparency of a model?

[NexoKami]

So far I’ve heard it’s not possible to have a smoother effect on the model other than using the loop function itself. If additional, would size work as well?

		local Tween = game:GetService("TweenService")
		local Info = TweenInfo.new(1)
		for n, m in pairs (mon:GetChildren()) do
			local tween = Tween:Create(m,Info,{Transparency = 0})
			tween:Play()
			tween.Completed:Wait()
		end

mon is an humanoid model, R6 rig.

[anon81993163]

A little bit of rearranging and setting the variable outside the scope, waiting for the final tween to complete only. Although some others might consider using task.spawn() or coroutines.

local Tween = game:GetService("TweenService")
local Info = TweenInfo.new(1)

local tween
for _, instance in pairs(mon:GetChildren()) do
	tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})
	tween:Play()
end
tween.Completed:Wait()

[NexoKami]

Ty for responding. Since this is a rig R6, it detected humanoids and I’ve had the same problem as before. Following errors:

TweenService:Create no property named ‘Transparency’ for object ‘Humanoid’

on the lines

tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})

Unless there is a way to detect every other but humanoid.
For the other two you have suggested, mind giving me an example of transparency (and if possible, size) and how to use them?

[NexoKami]

Never mind, I solved my own problem using :GetDescendants() (which I’ve always thought was depreciated) and isA(""). Though, I’m still curious about task.spawn() and coroutines.

[anon81993163]

Simply use if statements.

local Tween = game:GetService("TweenService")
local Info = TweenInfo.new(1)

local tween
for _, instance in pairs(mon:GetChildren()) do
	if type(instance.Transparency) == "number" then
		tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})
		tween:Play()
	end
end
tween.Completed:Wait()

Examples that use task.spawn() or coroutine.wrap() would be these:

task.spawn()

local Tween = game:GetService("TweenService")
local Info = TweenInfo.new(1)

for _, instance in pairs(mon:GetChildren()) do
	-- Disadvantageous on figuring out when it all is completed.
	-- Requires a boolean change(but will only know the first Tween is completed
	-- Might use a number to see if 1:1 is completed
	task.spawn(function()
		if type(instance.Transparency) == "number" then
			local tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})
			tween:Play()
			tween.Completed:Wait()
		end
	end)
end

coroutine.wrap()() – 2 versions

local Tween = game:GetService("TweenService")
local Info = TweenInfo.new(1)

-- A
for _, instance in pairs(mon:GetChildren()) do
	-- Unlike task.spawn(), using return within the function will return the value, not thread
	-- Still disavantageous because it cannot tell when it is done
	coroutine.wrap(function()
		if type(instance.Transparency) == "number" then
			local tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})
			tween:Play()
			tween.Completed:Wait()
		end
	end)()
end

-- B
local completed
for _, instance in pairs(mon:GetChildren()) do
	-- Different approach but returns the event, solves A problems
	completed = coroutine.wrap(function()
		if type(instance.Transparency) == "number" then
			local tween = Tween:Create(instance, Info, {Transparency = 0})
			tween:Play()
			return tween.Completed
		end
	end)()
end

completed:Wait()

[NexoKami]

Wow! Thanks again for your time. I’ll look into more into those two, seems interesting to know more about.