Agreed! Everyone complains about the same games being on the front page. Roblox addresses this issue and now everyone is still complaining. This update is trying to help us. But most of the post are looking at this update from a players perspective rather than a developers perspective.
8 Likes
Agreed, which is wild for a developer forum.
But even from a player’s perspective I’d think this would be a net benefit if one were to take this as a cue to not fixate on player count so much and just play what looks interesting. And I imagine Roblox is also going to be surfacing new/unique/niche games a lot more in the near future, so that along with this change could completely transform the discover page for the better.
2 Likes
I find this update interesting, usually people and especially children base their opinion on the opinion of others, if the game has few players, usually we think it can be a bad game or in my personal opinion a game whose objectives are completed quickly and leaves players with nothing to do then very soon.
This may allow players to try more varieties of games and there will be a little effort to look for reviews of that game, I like this update, useful for both small and big games, specially small games. 
5 Likes
What if its a good single player game that has a decent storyline and overall stuff to do, not only that but has NPCs etc
2 Likes
How about you make it easier for Roblox developers to promote and be seen
This change will be a serious behavioral issue to me. As a part-time fan of Roblox, CCU measures had always been the encouragement for me to play Roblox throughout the years. In my personal opinion, I see it as a comfort due to transparency and allows me to join games depending on if I really want collaboration with other Roblox players or not on the time I felt like it. Removing this will heavily discourage me from using the platform as it’d be more inconvenient to see the CCU of a game by having to go on its page to view it which results me in second guessing.
As a part-time Roblox developer, the purpose of this UX change is really just… BS. “Contributed to a 6.79% increase in users discovering unique experiences”, but what’s the catch exactly? Are those “unique experience” already big or still really small until the change? I overthink and believe that players actually pay a lot less attention to games that deserves attention but still has CCU under 20 only achieved through searching and are not on the front page due to very lack of promotion from Roblox’s exploitative algorithm. If you don’t already have good CCU for a unique experience, then good luck with that. Instead, how about you make it more easier for developers to promote their game such as adding tags system? Repair your currently predatory advertising system? Non-commission games exploration sections?
8 Likes
It’s really nice because we can still see the player count, but only after we decided that we would try the game out.
4 Likes
Do I really have to click on a whole other page just to see how many players are in a game…? Also, on the topic of game tiles, do you guys plan on removing the thing where your friends hide the game statistics AND do you plan on adding back the dropdown that shows the game creator?
2 Likes
when i had access to them, the home page was actually more performant
1 Like
16:9 thumbnails are really cool it will allow for games to be way more creative with their icons and get the player’s attention, one thing I find annoying is that as a Developer I used to look at my game’s player count from the Homepage without clicking on it, now the CCU is covered by “1 Friends” which makes it harder to see how the game is doing without opening it’s details or going into the Creator Hub
1 Like
This post explains everything about why roblox shouldn’t hide CCU because of it’s importance for most users on roblox. Please reconsider some things before rolling this change out.
6 Likes
Removing player count does not do that, as long as game discovery is horrible, small games on Roblox won’t ever get attention. This reminds me of when YouTube got rid of the dislike button and said this would stop hate to creators. It didn’t.
2 Likes
That is not possible. That would involve changing the actual base code of the Roblox website. What Poppy is sharing would only be visible for you and anyone else who is using the code.
1 Like
Maybe i’m lost and there’s something super confusing, but why are so many people thinking this is removing the metric entirely off the platform? They’re only removing it from the game’s icon, you can still go to the page and view the active player count there, and nothing in this announcement implies that will be something you won’t be able to do. I genuinely feel like i might be missing something because i cannot understand how many people are misinterpreting this when the post is very clear about it from my eyes.
This update increases the chances people will join the game according to their own research, and it only really adds 2-5 more seconds to view a game’s active player count, i genuinely don’t understand the massive vitriol against this update.
12 Likes
Because change is disorienting. We (me, Diana, and the original Cuyler) want 2006 back.
4 Likes
I was not expecting to see so many negative reactions to this change, though I guess I should expect it by now.
First off, this change affects everyone, therefor everyone has a “valid” opinion. I won’t outright dismiss the players in this thread that are expressing how they feel about this change. That being said, I think the majority might not have insight on what this change actually means for them and the platform and may be applying a sort of “big company bad” bias towards this change.
As both a player and a full-time developer on this platform, here’s how I feel about the change and the discussion surrounding it, starting with some misconceptions;
“They’re removing our ability to see CCU”
This one seems to be the most prevalent in the replies however it is very important to understand this change only affects the new thumbnail tiles. We still have access to this metric in many places, including both the game page and icon tiles for players, as well as the creator dashboard for developers. This does make it harder to see the CCU (Concurrently Connected Users) for users at a glance. This does not make it impossible for anyone to collect these metrics nor access them.
“Ratings are a bad metric”
This is true, for the most part. They can easily be botted or otherwise manipulated by offering incentives for players to upvote their game. However, it is important to point out that CCU is also subject to these same issues and, in the case of offering incentives, is often abused even more than ratings. Many, many games offer playtime rewards. This includes the “top” (highest CCU) games and is an exceptionally common practice considering it can be tracked and acted upon, unlike ratings. Ratings also have a system in place to correct these issues when they are detected. I’ve had games get disliked bombed by competitors in the past and though it sucks, it has always been corrected in the end. To reiterate, ratings on Roblox are not a good metric but the same reasoning can be applied to CCU and neither are the only metrics (and IMO, not even the primary metrics) for determining the quality of an experience.
“Roblox is reducing the information we’re shown, leading to less informed decisions”
Correct… sort of? I don’t think wholesale reducing a player’s ability to make an informed decision is a good thing however this issue isn’t as black and white as that. The way I see it, this is shifting some of the source of information from the playerbase onto the developer. Very few if anyone in this reply section has mentioned that thumbnails allow developers to show more information about their game to potential players. However, they have pointed out that this change is a “waste of space” which I cannot agree with. This argument is akin to claiming that showing more tiles to players at once is beneficial and leads to more informed decisions (if that’s our goal). Showing players fewer experiences at once but showing more information about those experiences is an excellent way to show players about the actual content of the experience they’re looking at, rather than how much people enjoy it. The goal here from what I can tell is to get players into experiences they enjoy. This platform has an extremely diverse ecosystem of experiences and it is important to convey what you’re getting into at a glance. To me, this information is much more important than how generally appealing an experience is to a wide variety of players and leads me into my next point.
“Roblox is doing this because they’re greedy”
I can’t speak for the intentions of roblox executives however I will say pretty confidently that I believe this change was made with developers in mind. I don’t think this change was made to milk players for their money. If they wanted to do that, they would be doing the opposite and promoting their big earners and current top experiences. To me, this change is about controlling the incentives developers have when making and monetizing their experiences. At the moment, there is a big pressure on developers to create a game that appeals to the widest variety of players and rides right on the line between ethical and unethical practice. This is usually done through maximizing your influence on the metrics about your game that you don’t directly control (e.g. CCU, ARPDAU, ratings) which is exactly why we’re seeing more and more low quality content on the platform. Clearly Roblox recognizes this and is working against it despite it (I assume) not being their most profitable way forward.
“This just makes it so I have to click an experience, the increase in discoverability is too small to matter”
Yes! And no. To address the first half of this statement, it seems very likely that Roblox does want you to click on the experience. This is how users truly make informed decisions. You can only show so much information on the discover and home pages, if you like what you see then the next step is to click the page and see what else they have to offer. If you like that, then the next step is to play the game and so on and so forth. I understand that this extra step may be frustrating to some players but I think it is very important to understand that this isn’t the only step in deciding whether or not your game is played, nor is it the most important. Unlike YouTube, clicking on an icon does not count as a play/view. Games are much more complicated than videos and it is often hard to summarize them succinctly in such a limited format which is why having these layered sources of information is so important. Between thumbnails showing more information than icons and the personalized demographic thumbnails suggested in the post, I think this will lead players towards making more informed decisions about experiences they will enjoy. Not ones that appeal to as many people as possible to try to make as much money as possible.
To close off this already very long reply, I’d like to answer a question lots of players in this thread likely have; “Why should I care if this benefits developers?”
It’s simple. If you want to see more genuinely fun, engaging experiences on the platform that aren’t focused on draining you of every last penny, developers need to benefit from making those kinds of experiences. Hopefully this provided some insight to people who may feel upset about this change.
This is something I have a very large personal investment in considering I both enjoy games on this platform and create them for a living. It is important to me that Roblox makes changes that benefit the players and developers more than shareholders. If this change doesn’t work out, it can always be reverted. However, in the end I’m excited that Roblox has shown recently that they care about this issue and I’m looking forward to seeing where this goes.
11 Likes
I don’t take issue with the removal of the player count on the icons itself. Rather, I take issue with the lack of search capability for multiplayer, or single player, games. I feel a filter on the Discover page for Server Size would fix this lack of agency to find those games. A Filter for Free Private Servers too.
If I want to play with 5 friends, I need a Server Size of at least 6. And, I might want to use a Private Server to make getting into a server easier.
But, that stuff is somewhat off topic for what you’re discussing. It sounds like the crux of the issue is people being adverse to change. Which I can understand. I think Roblox should tailor its message to be more sympathetic to those people. Some will understand, but others will be vehemently against it. 
This quote matches that last part:
2 Likes
I’d like to know who at Roblox even thought of this. It’s such a crucial feature for making quick judgments, but now users will click depending on the thumbnail and (easy botted) rating alone.
7 Likes
I don’t think you read my post properly or you’re purposely arguing something I didn’t say because your understanding of my complaint is wrong.
I did not say player count predicts if it’s good.
I said it’s to find people.
Between games with consistent full servers or dwindling servers, I prefer games that have consistent full ones.
1 Like
That isnt anywhere as convienent as simple glancing at the player count and deciding if the game is worthwhile to play. I dont want to click on a bunch of different games and wait for them to load so I can see the player count instead of just looking at it. I can definetly see how removing player count would affect the discovery of experienced. But I dont want that to come at the cost of forcing the user to try out new game simply because they are inconvienced by the missing player count.
Oh and also
I’d prefer to think of it as if youtube removed the view count from the user. Viewing how many people are playing the game is that crucial for me.
3 Likes
W Roblox update (this is super rare)
5 Likes