Timeless Valkyrie Crown is incorrectly positioned and oriented

Bug Reports Catalog Asset Bugs
#31

You do realize not everyone is completely interested in purchasing specific embeds, there could be thousands of thousands of owners, your just not in you’re right to see who owns what.

You started a man-child whining session because they didn’t wanna fix something you likely don’t own which has basically nothing wrong with the way it already is, you made it a whole historical whining session about previous employees and all that junk about how Roblox is stupid and isn’t that good anymore, it’s just an offset hat, calm down.

It’s 1 problem and suddenly the company is in shambles and your the only one who knows best, please get a grip, you know nothing of the internalized workings of Roblox so don’t you dare comment on something they likely had a good reason to deny, it isn’t their job to explain to you in baby terms why something isn’t going to happen, maybe, just maybe, you could wait for the so called accessory positioning update, and do it yourself, you don’t have to be totally rude to staff that are just doing what they can, your lucky they even listen at all.

3 Likes
#32

Irrelevant, adds nothing to what was being discussed.

If you consider that a “man-child whining session” for discussing a topic, please refer to all others complaining about it as a “man-child” as well.

Having signed an NDA under Roblox previously and have been on the website much longer, unsure what place you have in speaking to this but feel free to explain, I’d be interested in hearing it.

#33

The main fault in your argument is confirmation bias. If someone buys something, it doesn’t mean that they accept the current condition of it. Remember some of these buyers are children, and they don’t have a voice on the forum. Also, some users don’t try on an accessory before they purchase it; They see that it’s Valkyrie and assume that it will fit like a traditional Valkyrie. This results in them purchasing something that they didn’t realize has limitations. Realistically, a user will still wear an accessory (most likely with addons) even if they don’t like how it looks in order to get their money’s worth (in this case, ~$200 USD). I can personally relate to this situation by owning the Dominus Formidulosus and experiencing issues with it before it was partially fixed.

This category is partly for art issues with Roblox-created accessories, so some of the reports in it will be subjective to some degree. If technical issues were only reported, there wouldn’t be a way to report issues with accessories in terms of aesthetics. We have the right to post constructive criticism. Personally, I strive to help the Avatar Team make accessories look their best.

P.S. Ad hominem attacks only reduce the credibility of your arguments. Also, picking a fight with someone on a bug report is frowned upon and unprofessional.

1 Like
#34

The item itself does not cost 200, it costs around 150 to purchase, people most likely accept the current condition of the item if they care enough to view what it looks like, which is most likely 90% of users who take a peek at it (as it genuinely costs a bit of money), don’t mention children like you act like they have the absolute money from their parents to afford such an investment, this is absolutely irrelevant as its most likely near a mere 1% of people who purchased being a “child”.

I’m aware everything is subjective and people have a right to their own opinions, nothing about what he said was generally constructive, it was extremely destructive, as he was basically insulting the entire staff team by mentioning how based on this one issue that isn’t going to be resolved he thought he should mention how Roblox is “out of touch”,

This further proves the “I have no idea what the community wants” mindset

and for absolutely no reason and being extremely irrelevant to the general issue at hand, mentioned how if the fact that the original employees were still on the platform, this issue wouldn’t even be a thing, which is still even if alittle, insulting the work all the current staff members do for Roblox,

With the majority of all original workers no longer working for the company, which does not come at a surprise, maybe listening to something as simple as “fixing the position of the hat”

even despite saying he’s had “personal experience within Roblox”, has absolutely no idea how Roblox works and if this may disrupt future plans, has to be first checked out, or anything of the sort, times change and even if he’s “been on Roblox longer than me”, which is petty and irrelevant, he should be aware that things don’t stay the same and things may not work the way he believes they do.

Having signed an NDA under Roblox previously and have been on the website much longer, unsure what place you have in speaking to this but feel free to explain, I’d be interested in hearing it.

It’s very, very unprofessional to outright insult staff members because they won’t fix a small issue, if someone feels the need to be disrespectful to people who are actually willing to listen, then I feel like they deserve the same treatment back, and this report has been closed, so it’s not considered a bug at this time, which he should’ve accepted, you can’t make something subjective that’s already been decided.

3 Likes
#35

Guy, He paid for the bundle, so did plenty others. I think they’re at least “Entitled” to the information that “Hey, this hat isn’t going to fit on the default head like EVERY other valk released before has.”

The fact that you’re going leaps and bounds to defend a corporation who does NOT care about you is interesting.

Perhaps though Roblox should add a refund system, where you can refund 3-5 clothing or gamepasses within a time window, per year. Seeing as how many games nowadays offer the option to refund cosmetics a certain amount of times per year exists, I see no reason for Roblox to not share a similar system (You even already get refunds when UGC items are moderated).

I’m sure me and many others have been burned on non-functioning gamepasses before too, so the option to refund those within 30 minutes or an hour would be great considering there’s pretty much nothing you can do otherwise, and gamepasses can get pretty pricey.

4 Likes
#36

To help the Avatar Team decide if they should reconsider this report, I’ve decided to post a poll. This poll will provide another way for visitors and those who haven’t posted to voice their opinion. Also, it has a neutral question to avoid the wording effect. I encourage everyone to vote regardless if you’re in favor or against. Please note that if the majority vote in favor, it doesn’t guarantee that it will reconsidered. However, just because this report is marked as closed, doesn’t mean that it can’t be reconsidered.

Should the Timeless Valkyrie Crown’s position be changed?
  • Yes
  • No

0 voters

1 Like
#37

I don’t know what your problem is. Do you like to argue (you’ve done this before on the report for the “Ten Million Robux Man” for no reason)? I like how you just cherry picked my statements without acknowledging the valid potential scenarios that I provided. Unless you have access to the demographic of the Timeless Valkyrie Crown’s sales, you can’t make statements with outlandish percentages (“90%” and “1%” are pretty extreme). These percentages are borderline providing false hope for your argument.

2 Likes
#38

Because what you stated really isn’t a bug report, the R6 version of that bundle is genuinely just like that, and always has been, did you think it just one day decided to have skin? It’s added manually, you can submit a #feature-requests regarding that, but generally it isn’t a bug.

The most I can provide is the fact people purchase add-ons to the Valkyrie, I can’t stalk official assets, and the fact people do purchase add-ons still shows the fact that people purchase it, I don’t really have to provide any kind of genuine charting for a “how many children purchase” scale, as this should just be common sense, why would a child have 150 dollars to purchase this Valkyrie, what you’re assuming is very unreasonable, and I would hope to assume people would genuinely check what they purchase first, which is still something that it seems most people lack inside of this thread, as that really just devalues their entire statement because they got themselves into something they couldn’t even do a basic look around on.

I acknowledged a great deal and read through it so I could reply to it all, I mentioned 90% due to the fact I would generally assume people to have looked over an expensive purchase before inevitably buying, that feels like common sense. (as mentioned above)

I have a right to speech, as do you when you decided to complain as if the major opinion decides the fate of this “closed” bug report, you can’t devalue my statements as you believe yours are more righteous which is factually deniable, you can’t “re-decide” as you genuinely believe, there’s no repeat, and you’re going to be breaking the rules by making repeat reports, you have no real standing and it’s over, I hope you one day realize the accessory fitting update is exactly what you need and to actually wait your turn instead of being impatient and annoying to staff who already denied this report.

I want you to further realize this horrible error as we go back to this next “suggestion”

image

This is horrible, if you couldn’t tell, it even less fits the actual Valkyrie, and looks generally awful from behind, the fact is that the person who made it only considered the front view, which is wrong, it’s going to look as “bad as it did from the front” but worse.

image

Pushing this further, this is how it would look pushed upwards, which isn’t that good, and I would rather have the Valkyrie not shrank just for you’re demands, rather it’s fine in the position it is, which shows most of you genuinely never tried to use this hat ever as it’s absolutely fine with hair, and other accessories, it just feels like baseless complaining when it’s not even been used for even a second, I would rather you discuss why you feel the need for this to be a bug-report, but it’s not needed, and you shouldn’t press any of this further to me, or any of the staff.

1 Like
#39

It’s not Roblox’s job to give you a refund on something you obviously should’ve scoped out before purchasing, there’s a multitude of extensions that actually show you a 3D rendition of you’re avatar wearing said item, even a basic icon view of what you’re avatar may look like wearing said asset if you even bother to look at “Try On”, which is built-into the platform, which kind of makes you a chud since you should genuinely take a peek at what you buy before you purchase something, as this is a very expensive purchase and you’re just going to purchase it with no prior review? That just sounds like stupidity, not a them problem.

Just because I feel the need to not endlessly slander something that doesn’t deserve it doesn’t mean anything, I hope you realize you’re just being bias for no reason against a platform that’s trying it’s hardest.

I myself have purchased this bundle and actively use the Valkyrie, I don’t see why something I say may not be even more of value as in the fact I have styled this Valkyrie instead of complaining what it looks like without any accessories equipped.

#40

Your reactions are proving more and more hilariously outrageous as time goes on

Yeah you’re right, It’s not Roblox’s JOB to do that. It’s not their JOB to do anything, except… oh, wait… improving the player’s experience with the product.

Another thing that is Roblox’s responsibility (JOB) to produce as much revenue as possible for it’s many “hardworking”, as you would deem them, employees. Clearly the solution you so eagerly dismissed to defend the poor defenseless multi billion dollar company from, works; most games with cosmetics have the option to refund non-unique skins. Almost every brick and mortar store has a return policy for new items. Almost every major online retailer has a return policy for purchased items. The 3-Day escrow on sales is ALREADY a thing in Roblox as well. So don’t tell ME that they don’t have the bandwidth for an update like this.

This is why you shouldn’t open your mouth if you don’t know what you’re talking about. Yes-men like you who validate every little thing Roblox does or doesn’t do are the reason we never see any actual progress towards issues like these addressed.

So since you’re so QUALIFIED to tell everyone here what Roblox should and shouldn’t do, could you please debunk my previous point as to why almost every retailer worth their salt allows refunding, but somehow this wouldn’t be viable for Roblox? I fail to see how all these other companies would have such a practice in place if it doesn’t somehow make them money in the long run. :slight_smile:

3 Likes
#41

You took no read of what I just said, cherry picked it, and put it together like I’m awful, I could’ve said legitimately anything and you’d make it a me problem, I never said anything regarding what you’re accusing me of, once you get you’re little joker act together maybe we can talk, but until then please don’t just twist my words.

#42

You edited your post 6 times. Sure.

#43

And just as a little side note to this, I didn’t even buy the bundle. I’m just saying the people that did get burned should have been informed considering the package costs 200 dollars. So your little personal attacks of me being “Stupid” for not looking are irrelevant. You’re just not smart enough to make a real argument.

#44

You’re not smart enough to know when a battle isn’t yours, you didn’t even buy it so I don’t know why you decide you need to complain, this discussion should be limited to people who actually have experience within the items usage, as what else are you complaining about as an outsider who doesn’t even have the capacity for such a purchase, you’re entire thing was attempting to piggy-back off this thread for a refund system because you want one in general, not just because or centering this fact, you wanted to abuse this thread if it got any traction once again, you’re lacking any sort of common sense and just keep picking through what I’m saying to you, once again comb through it and respond to it reasonably, not picking through it.

I edit my posts when I make mistakes or add-on, it’s not that big of a deal.

#45

Are we really doing this? We can do this if you want to go off the rails.

image
image1254×250 26.8 KB

I’m done talking to you since you’ve decided to completely derail any possibility of constructive feedback in the thread with your childish personal attacks based on nothing.

2 Likes
#46

If you don’t want it changed just because you uploaded addons for it just say so. Everyone but you agrees the current position is really bad and prevents many from buying the bundle. The current position covers too much of the face, the position should just be consistent with all the other valkyries, everyone can agree it works best.

5 Likes
#47

That is not what I said, at all, go ahead and read out.

1 Like
#48

You saying the current position is fine is all i need to hear

3 Likes
#49

Because… it is? Have you never once attempted any kind of hats, this report is closed, what you need to hear, is that this isn’t going to be revived and to get over it, I hope this “TLDR” works for you.

You made the 2nd bad suggestion, I think I’d enjoy if the hat’s back actually hit my head instead of just floating on all sides, I hope you do realize it’s fine the way it is and you just need to actually wear hats.

1 Like
#50

Yeah it’s a REALLY bad suggestion as everyone but you likes it, do you also enjoy the front completely covering the eyes? Is that great positioning? Have you ever heard a soul complain about the position of the OG valks? I don’t even know what you mean by that “you just need to actually wear hats” nonsense, the valk is literally unwearable for me, but okay buddy

3 Likes