What are you working on currently? (2017)

looks more alpaca-ish

I wanted to Illustrate the power of the new free-cam tool.

I do realize that there are some glitches in the video, I did this in about 30-45 minutes. I’ll upload a better version soonTM

13 Likes

Wow cool video, also what is that map? It also looks cool

Another train. This one doesn’t actually exist.

5 Likes
  1. castle black
  2. king’s landing
  3. highgarden
1 Like

The man, the myth, the legend. Tribute to @ScriptOn, my favourite scripter. Your our golden trophy!

9 Likes

Haha sweet. Is that blender?

3 Likes

Yep

no it’s a trophy

12 Likes

Been practicing Blender a bit.

Neat! I had a scene I made in late May using similar models. Yours looks way better. The absence of fireflies must mean you spent a lot of time rendering that. Keep it up!

Your render looks quite grainy/noisy.

1 Like

Yeah, this was done months ago on a small timeframe, I did it for free for someone. Those grains are called fireflies in blender. I had to increase the sampling big time. I would never do that nowadays lol. It would be shameful.

That’s just a ton of noise from not having enough samples, I can’t really see any fireflies.

1 Like

Lol, in blender, or as Andrew Price says it. That annoying noise thing is called fireflies, not that im trying to trick you to like it by saying that those are legit fireflies

I’m almost certain that those aren’t fireflies. (to my knowledge)

Pretty sure it is noise.

This is an example of fireflies.

image

1 Like

wdym by fireflies, legit fireflies. For me, fireflies and noise are one and the same, just different ways of saying it. At least according to Andrew Price

Look at the image, you can see white pixels in places, in the section where it says “WITH FIREFLIES”.

Here, this shows noise with fireflies and without , image

2 Likes

I see what you mean. I guess I associated noise with fireflies. Maybe because I hate both for making shorter renders look uglier. :smiley: thanks for pointing that out tho.

No problem.