From a developers POV how much does relevancy, credibility matter when it comes to working on long term projects? I’ve noticed my business approach has been misinterpreted as hostile, pushy, or arrogant. I don’t intend on giving up nor do I want to repeat 2018 therefore I must change however I’m clueless as to what I should try differently.
Here’s the dilemma:
I lack any noteworthy business experience among the community.
I’m not satisfied with my current skillset in building,graphic design, and I can’t write a single line of code.
I can only invest $1,000 in the project due to financial problems.
Issues that need to be addressed:
How flexible should I be with availability? In the past I had required 1% of the project complete on a weekly basis which I felt was fair.
Is 1,000 USD too low of a budget for a long term project? My original plan was to distribute the 1,000 in separate payments instead of a direct payout.
(Payment distribution will be altered if a builder,gfx peaks my interest)
Scripters previous payment plan:
Closed Beta: (Paid access): $100 upon completion
Open Beta: $100 upon completion.
Alpha: $800 upon completion + %
(percentages distributed after 1,000 USD has been reinstated from Developers exchange)
While others may think I’m foolish for paying without guaranteed success I believe hard work should be at least compensated.
What I’ve noticed (Correct me if I’m wrong as this is just speculation):
Simplicity is preferable to a developer as it’s more likely to be successful, easier to manage compared to a complex assignment.
The majority of developers are less likely to be risk takers preferring to remain in their safe zone such as generic simulators.
If money is their only motive in the project than they’ll most likely lose interest.
Lack of communication happens frequently since there’s no set time for a meeting (I’m guilty of this myself)
My apologies in advance if this was placed in the incorrect category, thank you for taking the time to read this.