Thanks for bringing that up i didn’t realize that!
working on accounts, although as of right now, the tracking and prevention measures in place should work fine.
We are actually working on a login system and stats.
I also believe that like/dislike issue is new bc it wasn’t here when I started to eat. Will fix ASAP.
1 Like
It also looks like ur using the name of the ad instead of a unique ad Id. This might lead to problems with duplication in the future, so I recommend using a unique Id per ad.
1 Like
I liked my own ad twcie, so I don’t think it’s currently working
We do have backend ad identification with unique numbers, we do some backend processing to see which ad was served last in order to determine which ad was liked, we also have prevention measures to prevent identical ads from being published
1 Like
intereseting, i can reproduce the issue, ill be working on it here directly.
1 Like
Yeah and I was able to reproduce it using this as well, with no proxies
fetch("https://admy.site/vote", {
"headers": {
"accept": "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9",
"accept-language": "en-US,en;q=0.9",
"cache-control": "max-age=0",
"content-type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
"sec-ch-ua": "\" Not A;Brand\";v=\"99\", \"Chromium\";v=\"101\", \"Google Chrome\";v=\"101\"",
"sec-ch-ua-mobile": "?0",
"sec-ch-ua-platform": "\"macOS\"",
"sec-fetch-dest": "document",
"sec-fetch-mode": "navigate",
"sec-fetch-site": "same-origin",
"sec-fetch-user": "?1",
"upgrade-insecure-requests": "1",
"Referer": "https://admy.site/",
"Referrer-Policy": "strict-origin-when-cross-origin"
},
"body": "adName=Rolimons+Module&like=like",
"method": "POST"
});
alright we are adding some preventative measures now
1 Like
Btw please dont do this, that’s artificially inflating votes and these requests will be blocked (or your like count will be completely reset)
1 Like
I was only doing it for the purpose of finding bugs, and the new prevention measures aren’t working. They are going through perfectly fine right now.
(i dont have the like button rn)
Alright, we’re working to patch this ASAP.
1 Like
Added a temporary duplicate like blocker
1 Like
I also fixed the catalog like/dislike buttons.
It’s not working as intended, I think the likes and dislikes should be pushed off until there is an AUTH system in place, but it shouldn’t make a huge difference as the website isn’t that popular currently.
yeah, its alright for right now, we are working on a more solid account system
2 Likes
I wasn’t able to get it working tonight (have to wait until @/Crcoli737 wakes up), but we did almost get the login system.
3 Likes
Why would I want to advertise a site that clearly has had no effort put into it? The layout is clearly a fork of a BootStrap template and there’s a copyright notice on the website footer when I found no trace of this in the official registry.
2 Likes
Thanks for the feedback.
We have actually been putting a ton of effort into it the past week.
Yea but would you rather have something that looks like the original one? When I tried making one myself it seemed people didn’t like it and we ended up scrapping it.
That question has to wait for @Crcoli737 i think
1 Like
I don’t use bootstrap so I wouldn’t notice, but if css is trouble then tailwind gives you easier and faster css and they have loads of library UI you can use like https://daisyui.com (Which I use and edit to make it my own) and it looks really clean. So when possible it would be good to maybe revamp the website design to stop it looking like a copy of a template to give it more professinionalism (can’t spell). I might make a new version of the website with tailwind since, well why not? (I have nothing else to do rn).
1 Like
Copyright laws still exist even if its not registered, if your trademark is registered, then you get the little (R) circle, but if its not then you get the (C) circle.
2 Likes