Diving into Generative AI

[AChubarokManager (a_me)]

This is awesome

[alpharetzy2 (alpharetzyfake2)]

Is the Code Generator and Material Generator part of the Generative AI experience? They are now in Studio as a beta feature.

[BobbieTrooper (Jason)]

I don’t know if this is a bug, But its appears that the AI doesn’t work within a scope. If i have for example 100 Lines, and i want to implement something, I have to put it outside every scope and it just doesn’t help out alot.

This doesn’t work:

This does:

[SimonEnderB]

Just wondering, how did you get the script AI to work. I was under the impression it was a prompt based thing, but others said it would predict code as you wrote it. Even still, while writing up a simple kill brick, nothing related to the AI happened.

[LockouDev]

Bro, that looks a lot like the Grinch’s face

[Dede_4242]

It actually is The Grinch’s face

[BobbieTrooper (Jason)]

Just write a comment like u normally do, like
– print hello world

Then press enter. If something appears then press tab

[VSCPlays]

if you need help, read this topic I created

How do i use the new Generative AI?

What do you want to achieve? I want to try out the new Generative AI Beta What is the issue? It doesn’t send me the code I expected it to give, especially when I press Tab and I am enrolled in beta channel [image] [image] What solutions have you tried so far? In this topic, It says press Tab but when i did that nothing comes I want to try out the new Generative AI but it doesn’t seem to work, I have the beta feature on and i’m enrolled in beta channel, but it doesn’t seem to work,…

[SubtotalAnt8185]

The script generator AI does not work very well at all. 99% when entering a prompt, nothing happens. A prefix in the comment like “AI:” would be nice.

When it does work, it’s not bad at all. For the most part, the function does work.

[earthyviking92 (Viking)]

I feel like this video is almost like a lie. Actually using this it doesn’t feel as exciting.

[JetUpNy]

The code writing aspect is cool and scary and junk! It doesn’t work out of the beta box! I want a refund! Just keeps outputting commented variations of the comments that are already in script. I went from excited to furious in 5 minutes! Junk!

[MightyDantheman (Fate)]

@earthyviking92

I feel like this video is almost like a lie.

It’s marketing video. Companies and developers do this all the time. They show of an example of what their end goal is like, not what their product can currently do. This is mainly to gain investor support or community “hype”.

I wouldn’t say it’s a bad thing, but it can definitely be misleading quite often. Game developers, especially indie, have to do this as well. It’s called a vertical slice demo. Although, in the case of this video, none of it was “real” yet.

[absentdenik (dauser)]

Im sorry, but what is that

I assume this AI is trained pretty well.

[Dede_4242]

I really don’t even understand how this got past Pre-Pre-Pre-Alpha…

[SubtotalAnt8185]

I would like to mention a few issues about the system and some suggestions about how it could possibly be improved.

For code completion:
It would be nice if the daily limit was changed, since it does not provide a consistent workflow when interacting with the AI. I’d suggest it should be an hourly limit or something similar.

Additionally, the tool doesn’t let us see the limit. A widget dedicated specifically for this tool to change the AI’s settings, view statistics, and rate the job it does would be nice.

The tool also sometimes doesn’t complete what it’s about to generate, with missing end statements and missing code in general. Could this be changed?

This tool also puts in bad coding practices, such as using the 2nd parameter for Instance.new. It would be nice if it was trained specifically not to do that, rather than making us put it into the prompt each time.

For material generation:
Server errors happen consistently. The tool doesn’t let us easily access the image for further editing (a built-in editor to offset the images would be nice). The images are also usually not top-down, which is likely a problem with the data the AI is trained on. I find this AI much less usable than the code completion AI, since I’ve only gotten around two materials that actually might suit my needs.

The limits of materials in general, such as lack of transparency and depth, are also a problem. Maybe an AI that can actually build structures given a prompt would be more useful?

---

@absentdenik

I assume this AI is trained pretty well.

Blame the people who actually made the free models have that in their script.

[BanditBashers (asd)]

now can you let us archive IMAGES (not decals)

[The_Trypha (Goofy)]

Code completion is a great addition, but it’s kind of misleading and way too creative, going around and creating new commands i’ve never wanted to create at all.

The only thing I wanted was local targetplayer = args[1]

It’s also inventing new services, such as banservice with it’s own new functions… Which concerns me to say the least.

[VortexColor]

Just a question. Do we get IP rights over the AI generated content? If not what license/copyright is it under.

Knowing this is a 100% must for any serious developer.

[SubtotalAnt8185]

@The_Trypha

going around and creating new commands i’ve never wanted to create at all.

I’ve done literally the same thing. I’ve found the AI is capable of learning the template command and it can create the command for you by using it for reference. This allows it to create more commands with ease, and with a higher confidence level it will likely actually produce more.

[masterflame1029 (RageDev)]

Dunno how ifeel about this, On one hand, it help’s people with less scripting knowledge get a boost. Bu on the other hand, It beats the point of scripters and scripting in general