Roblox Developer Forum Logo Updated

[Kariu]

There’s also digital artists, offsite developers, clothing designers, etc. who have also been defined as developers. It seems strange to have us all associated with Studio when there’s a big chunk of us who barely, if at all, use Studio.

[younite]

people think I use studio when in reality I dont

[EchoReaper]

If anyone wants it, I just made a partially-dark theme for the site that goes really well with the blue logo:

https://userstyles.org/styles/154099/devforum-professional

https://gfycat.com/IncompleteClosedFruitbat

[younite]

Thank you so much

[anon80475429]

img.logo-big {
    content: url("https://i.imgur.com/GuGNAJq.png");
}

img.logo-small {
    content: url("https://i.imgur.com/e1JVQIW.png");
}

#site-logo {
    content: url("https://i.imgur.com/zlEsPZ5.png");
}

This simple CSS will allow you to use whatever icons you want (default is a restore of the old icons) providing you have something like stylebot/stylish installed and you can easily force the favicon link to redirect if you wanted to go that far. All this talk but we know the best logo

[younite]

Should be completely proportional now! Sorry if I triggered any OCD.

[TheInnovative]

I feel like the grid strays a little to far from their other logos, but the brackets are genius

[byc14 (byc)]

"Creator Community" still shows the old logo

[einsteinK]

I was bored, so I tried making one myself. I feel like the scaling of the wrench is… weird… but I like the idea of the layout and stuff, although it needs a professional touch:

Here’s the SVG of the above logo, and the roblox logo:

Roblox Logo

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="934.939" height="934.939" viewBox="0 0 934.939 934.939">
  <metadata><?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.6-c138 79.159824, 2016/09/14-01:09:01        ">
   <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about=""/>
   </rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>
<?xpacket end="w"?></metadata>
<defs>
    <style>
      .cls-1 {
        fill: #e2231a;
        fill-rule: evenodd;
      }
    </style>
  </defs>
  <path class="cls-1" d="M480.1,282.522L1217.48,480.1,1019.9,1217.48,282.522,1019.9ZM679.431,627.77l192.8,51.661-51.661,192.8-192.8-51.661Z" transform="translate(-282.531 -282.531)"/>
</svg>

My Logo

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1500" height="1500" viewBox="0 0 1500 1500">
  <metadata><?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 5.6-c138 79.159824, 2016/09/14-01:09:01        ">
   <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about=""/>
   </rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>
<?xpacket end="w"?></metadata>
<defs>
    <style>
      .cls-1 {
        fill: #e2231a;
      }

      .cls-1, .cls-2, .cls-3 {
        fill-rule: evenodd;
      }

      .cls-2 {
        fill: #007eff;
      }

      .cls-3 {
        fill: #f37c1b;
      }
    </style>
  </defs>
  <path class="cls-1" d="M480.1,282.522L1217.48,480.1,1019.9,1217.48,282.522,1019.9ZM679.431,627.77l192.8,51.661-51.661,192.8-192.8-51.661Z"/>
  <path class="cls-2" d="M688.229,643.01L856.99,688.229,811.771,856.99,643.01,811.771Z"/>
  <path class="cls-3" d="M997.951,1078.01l-87.861,50.73L502.049,421.99l87.861-50.727Z"/>
  <path class="cls-3" d="M311,302l30-52,90,148,112-1,59-112L523,147l57-1,91,156L581,458l-182,1Z"/>
  <path id="Shape_1_copy" data-name="Shape 1 copy" class="cls-3" d="M1187,1198l-30,52-90-148-112,1-59,112,79,138-57,1-91-156,90-156,182-1Z"/>
</svg>

everytime I look at it, I like it less and less

[Veldaren]

I like that they removed the “Developer” text. It looks better, but still lacks originality.

[ColdSmoke]

Honestly it needs to not exist, or exist as “Dev” or “Developer Forum”. Just having the word Developer looks very odd and out of place.

[TaaRt]

I am happy as long as the logo in my tab does not look like a webclient for studio really.

[Naco88]

I made this a showcase of everything that goes on here!

[vsnry]

This is great!

[blutreefrog (blue)]

was doing a little art, came up with this, let me know what the opinions are

[chesse20 (ChesseThe FluffyWasp)]

I like it; very anti minimalist. Hope we get a thread/poll to vote on a replacement icon for the devforum.

[Azutreo (Azu)]

I personally think that the spammed logo seems a bit much. Perhaps just remove the circle of logos, and change the size and angle of the middle logo to represent that middle square in the large square.

hard to describe, so here is my suggestion in a pic.

[TechSpectrum]

Take my money!!!

[Aesthetical]

Does anyone else feel that any new logo should incorporate the forum colors?

[blutreefrog (blue)]

the circle is an important formal device