Vulnerabilities as in blocked functions or as in detections? Just so you know @HexadecimalLiker has a whole thread on detections and for every executor (other than synapse z, which is down) the c stack overflow method has reliably detected executor’s metamethod hooking. Yes, fixes are rare for detections. Otherwise if you mean blocked functions then yes that’s likely
And take into consideration all the mobile exploits. Preloadasync has existed for years, and yet these executors are completely annihilated by the detection method. Yes, they are rare. Maybe not for the high quality ones, but there are always other methods to strike them down.
Also tostring is public on v3rm go look for it
yeah one you cried about. you’re literally contradicting yourself. you’re acting like id release OP detections for free lol.
release 9 more awp detections please
also leak citadel source for the skids here
good for u, im pretty sure everyone does now that i’ve leaked it here
ur anticheat is nothing special lol
allat yap and you still fsil to bypass it
also nobody cares about me checking virutalinput
and people here are too underdeveloped in terms of critical thinking to recreate citadels anti hook
Okay yeah, Wave was a blocked function, while SirHurt and AWP weren’t However, they fixed it they just need you to report the vulns to them and they will patch it.
and youre too underdeveloped to realise i was talking about the UGCValidationService
and i havent even tried to bypass it?
If you’re reporting the vulns that’s a different story in this case the point is that publicizing detections get them patched (which, again, usually they dont; there are specifics for each executor yet to be patched)
this is truly tragic. https://youtu.be/LFsc64LLPKk whole client side of ur anticheat bypassed within 5 lines of code 
literally bypasses everything, even your so-called “unbypassable” anti-hook functions lol. next time lets learn how to detect an exploiter making all functions in a script turn nil shall we!
yeah his anticheat really is nothing special https://youtu.be/LFsc64LLPKk. bypassed in 5 lines of code
noooo how dare i weaktable ugc service and check if it exists
im a monster!!!
i said client side got completely bypassed. can probably emulate ur handshake but dont got enough time to do that
whats the point of the bypass if the handshake kicks you
Proves your anti-tamper methods are worthless if you rely on handshakes lol
doesnt matter if they are useless ans get bypassed or not aslong as something detects you the anticheat did its job
Whilst that’s true you constantly brag about your client side anti tampering, yet it is bypassed with 5 lines of code. The ragebaits are crazy considering you could bypass the client the way I did and then make a handshake emulator lol
false
i specifically brag about the anticheat itself being unbypassable