Is there a reason why alt-clicking selects textures now when a part is inside of a model?
I feel like this does more harm than good, because you’d have to delete the texture or select the part manually from the explorer.
Other than that small problem, this is a fantastic update!
Thanks for utilizing the new highlight feature! The selections look so much better. Anyways, will you have something in the context menu to turn off AlwaysOnTop? I personally find it quite annoying to have this enabled by default.
FINALLY, the selection boxes wont be annoying when making small detail!
This is great. Exited to try it out.
While this is definitely an interesting addition, in regards to the selection change, I have two inconveniences with it.
It is extremely hard to tell the difference between a grouped and ungrouped model. The only way I can tell if I’ve ungrouped a model, is in the explorer. Other than that, visually they look the same to me?
I can’t exactly recall what alt-clicking something did, as it’s entirely in my reflex memory to use it, but something about it just seems off? If you hold alt and click something, it’ll eventually click the object that is behind it? And it could continue if you had a series of objects in a row. I’ve come to realize this is selection cycling.
I think alt-clicking might’ve had to do something with selecting a texture inside of a parent, without selecting the parent? It also seems touchy on which texture I can select?
I’m holding alt on the entirety of this video
Other than that, thanks for your work, and thanks for adding the bounding box option!
EDIT
I’d also like to formally request that Ctrl/Cmd+B be the keybind behind selecting the parent. I’ve had a plugin for the past few years that does exactly that, and it’s the perfect keybind for the job.
This is a much needed feature! However, will we get the LineThickness property from Highlight for developers use?
I’ll stick to boxed selections for now, but this is a good change. I’m also concerned about how selecting objects that already have highlights works. Sometimes, there will be little to no contrast expressed when hovering over an item that already has a highlight.
Also, it’s impossible to distinguish selected items from deselected items when they are visually contained within a selected item. For example, a selected Baseplate overshadows these two carrots. One of them is selected, and one of them isn’t. Can you tell which one it is? There is a 50% chance your guess is incorrect 
Also, selecting the bounding box toggle adds the box instead of replacing the outline. That’s a little strange:
Edit: Can you guys add a way for us to find the current hover selection in Selection since it’s no longer immediately clear due to the addition of selection cycling? This would help plugins customize the look of selections.
SELECTION. CYCLING. THANK. YOU.
This update will definitely improve my selection workflow tremendously, it makes selecting and viewing MeshParts, Unions and Models a whole lot easier as it isn’t just a box. The explorer changes today are very welcome as well. 
I was not actually expecting to see selection cycling, which surprised me, and I’ve been waiting for something like this for years now and it’s awesome to finally see it. I can’t tell you how many times I tried to select something like an NPC’s Torso under their HumanoidRootPart, or meshes with huge bounding boxes over something else, which caused so much irritation.
Is there any chance we could see more customization options, like the ability to add inner highlight color and transparency? It could help me in certain circumstances where the outer edges may not be entirely on screen, like inside of multiple rooms.
Still kinda prefer the box selection we have, but it’s worthy in exchange for the rest of the features listed here, looks great
While this one is going to take a minute to get used to, it is awesome to see this change. Mouse-click functionalities felt especially dated with how advanced some stuff on studio is becoming and it’s great to see that this has not been forgotten about.
Thank you for this!
A mixture of opinions about this.
I am NOT a fan of highlighting the entire object part, I believe the selection box method rather than highlighting it was easier than how it is now, tho, by all means, I do believe that it will grow on me eventually. But it’s still a hard adjustment.
I DO LIKE that it’s way easier to work with tiny objects now, and that you can actually see the changes you’re making by zooming in and out. That part I’m totally a fan of.
I DO and DONT like the TeamCreate changes with this before it would only turn green if someone in a TeamCreate file selected an object, now it is random, I like that but the highlighted part of it is a heavy distraction, and just covers way too much unnecessary space on a screen, I wish the opacity or thickness of it was lower when on a TeamCreate file another user selects an object.
But that’s about it.
I do believe that it’s a GREAT change, but with a few needed tweaks and changes. Heavily more so on the TeamCreate part, love for that to be less bright and more transparent.
The previous bounding box is pretty important for knowing when a model has rotation, so whilst I will be toggling bounding boxes back on initially it would be nice to somehow replicate that use case with the new highlights. But just make sure there are no plans to ever remove the option to use the old bounding boxes
(The original post was about bounding boxes not being visible anymore, but after reading one of the replies above, I discovered that enabling through the “View” tab is possible and thus deleted the original message.)
New post:
Please enable “Bounding Boxes” by default. I feel like it should be opt-out rather than opt-in for easier readability.
I agree, the AlwaysOnTop is a bit annoying, but the rest looks great!
Honestly, after actually using the selection cycling part of the update. Please let us disable this feature, It’s so counterproductive for myself and it is making selecting a specific part inside of a model beyond hard. I keep selecting the instance behind the model itself.
Thank you.
Yayy, good update! Side question, does this mean we can use more than ~30 highlights at a time now?
Finalllyyy, a Roblox update that gives a setting instead of outright removal!
I think you meant “not valuable” or something alongside the lines of that. invaluable means to be priceless.
Also I really agree with your reply. We should be able to toggle most settings on this new selection update so people can find what works best for them. Changes like these won’t exactly fit the use case of everyone.
I believe a reply from earlier mentioned that the use of Highlights makes it hard to distinguish what is what. You also can’t disable the AlwaysOnTop attribute of this highlight featured that’s packed into the selection system.
More options = the better!
Something I noticed with selection in general is the selection accuracy. This is evident when you’re working with more complex models that contain custom meshes with CollisionFidelity set to “Box”.
The reason I bring this up is because the new selection outline shows you exactly what mesh you’re attempting to select. But it also shows you that its really difficult to select certain meshes that are within the bounding box of another mesh.
It seems like selection accuracy is dependent on CollisionFidelity, it works great when on Default or PreciseConvexDecomposition but works terribly with Box. Is there any possibility to have selection accuracy ignore the Box collision setting? Selection cycling seems like the solution to this but It seems a bit odd showing a selection of a mesh that my mouse isn’t currently hovering over.
Something I’d like to have in this would be having the highlight AND the selection boxes from before at the same time. I like how you can have the highlight and the selection boxes at the same time. Some of my issues are that the outline is way too thick and as others mentioned, it’s hard to determine if something is grouped or not.
can it please just be either selection box or highlight, highlights are way to intrusive for me, especially with models.
