Universal Executor Detection [Mac, Windows, Android]

Resources Community Resources
,
#81

it can be effective, just learn how exploits and roblox internally works, youll be able to stop more than 99% of exploiters with just a client sided ac

#82

All it takes is one person who bypasses, then it is spread to the noobs who dont know how to bypass themselves. so that mentality is never a good approach. Eg a game like bedwars. Has an anticheat. So, when a smart exploiter finds a way to bypass it , the script will get to the noobs and they will use it too!

#83

for it to be patched in 1 day, then another month of trying to bypass. not worth it

#84

So the exploiter will obsufucate the script then what?
Pardon my spelling im on mobile

#85

Obfuscation won’t stop analyzing the script. Thats how game owners stop exploits

#86

i wouldn’t say you should FULLY rely on this detection as your only anti-cheat method but i wouldn’t say you should completely disregard it either, you’re better off automatically whitelisting your scripts to avoid false triggers as much as you can, this is how i do it

    local WhitelistedScripts = {}

    local function PopulateWhitelist()
        for _, v in pairs(game:GetDescendants()) do
            if v:IsA("LocalScript") or v:IsA("Script") or v:IsA("ModuleScript") then
                WhitelistedScripts[v] = true
            end
        end
    end

    PopulateWhitelist()

    local function GetInstanceMemory()
        local succ, err = pcall(function()
            game:GetService("Stats"):GetMemoryUsageMbForTag("Script")
        end)
        if err then
                   -- ban them here 
        else
            return game:GetService("Stats"):GetMemoryUsageMbForTag("Script")
        end
    end

    local val = 0
    local Paused = false
    local TimeThreshold = 5
    local LastScrAdded = 0
    local runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory()

    game.DescendantAdded:Connect(function(v)
        if (v:IsA("LocalScript") or v:IsA("Script") or v:IsA("ModuleScript")) and not WhitelistedScripts[v] then
            Paused = true
            LastScrAdded = tick()
            repeat Stepped:Wait()
                runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory()
                if not Paused then Paused = true end
            until runtimeval == val
            if not Paused and runtimeval ~= val then runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory() end
            Paused = false
        end
    end)

    game.DescendantRemoving:Connect(function(v)
        if (v:IsA("LocalScript") or v:IsA("Script") or v:IsA("ModuleScript")) and not WhitelistedScripts[v] then
            Paused = true
            LastScrAdded = tick()
            repeat Stepped:Wait()
                runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory()
                if not Paused then Paused = true end
            until runtimeval == val
            if not Paused and runtimeval ~= val then runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory() end
            Paused = false
        end
    end)

    task.spawn(function()
        pcall(function()
            while true do
                task.wait(0.5)
                local CurrentTime = tick()
                local TimeDiff = math.abs(CurrentTime - LastScrAdded)
                val = GetInstanceMemory()
                if not val then val = runtimeval + 5 end
                if val ~= runtimeval and not Paused and (TimeDiff > TimeThreshold and runtimeval < val) and not IsStudio then
                   -- ban them here
                    runtimeval = GetInstanceMemory()
                end
            end
        end)
    end)

i can’t really confirm whether or not this is reliable to use in a big production game but i will say i’ve been using this for around 2 weeks and it’s only gotten to false trigger once but that’s probably because of how my game is coded, in conclusion

– No, you should not use this so long as you use Fluffs for your game as a decompile counter

#87

This should NOT be used, memory is unpredictable and could spike randomly.

1 Like