We’re updating Heads!

That doesn’t make sense. Classic shirts and pants have co-existed with layered clothing for a while now and there have been no issues. The amount of classic faces and heads that exist is a mere fraction of this.

Furthermore, the copyright system isn’t even applied to assets created by the Roblox account, so I’m not sure how any of what you’re saying makes sense?

4 Likes

5 days and 1400 comments too late for bait to have any entertainment value

faces should be bundled together for simplicity’s sake at the very least

4 Likes

Which is why i thought that ‘leak’ from Bloxy News was promising. I still have no clue if it’s real or not considering the twitter account hasn’t clarified at all.

Why… Why would anyone want to do this? This is just absurd. No one wants their Roblox face to mirror their facial expressions, with the exception of online daters. Think of all the things online daters will be able to do with this…

Like kissing?

Even disregarding this stupid camera thing, why have you made the old faces offsale? I understand I will be able to use the classic faces I own, but what if I want to change my avatar and I need a new face? I need to purchase a dynamic face. No matter what you say, this change is being forced on us. I don’t approve of that, and neither do the other 1400 people who have replied to this post.

3 Likes

clothing, copyright, making slight changes can break the AI, that is how many users get pass the copyright system by uploading stuff like minecraft assets to the platform, however if it has 2 of the exact identical models, on the platform the AI can detect that, the 2d decal and 3d decal, ALL 2d decals as the admin stated will look like the 3d decal, same proportions, same height, etc. additionally it will create confusion and more lag to the platform keeping classic faces as a separate thing than combining both

the classic shirts and pants and layered clothes, are completely different, it takes more effort, more skills to copy what was a 2d shirt on a 3d shirt, than copying a decal and pasting a decal, even if it is copied it is completely different material different style etc, however the 3d faces INCLUDES THE 2D FACES, so it’s the exact same thing

1 Like

Looking over this thread reminds me that today is a good day to be headless. I had been using the stevie face for quite some time before it was upgraded; I firmly believe that this choice will further the immersion of Roblox experiences, but replacing classic faces without first standardizing their prior sizing and, on top of that, taking classic faces off the market, is a very hazardous commercial move.

4 Likes

same thing that was said for Voice Chat. It is not absurd it is modern technology, at least OD are to try it out and give feedback based on it instead of assumptions

kissing reactions may appear differently or might have a restriction or a instant ban for that

and if you want a new face for the 15th time, buy the 3d face and equip the 2d version by equipping the 3d face and disabling 3d face enabled.

1 Like

I think roblox does bad updates for attention.

2 Likes

roblox realizes that the majority of players are trying out CUSTOM UGC FACES, and headless, so ROBLOX decided to force this update upon us to show a new way faces can be used

additionally they do updates because it has to be done, you cannot want technology to improve if no one can implement it.

1 Like

No I don’t think so, roblox is 100% doing it for attention.

2 Likes

But they still might be false, do you really think a company like Roblox would seriously allow to leak info? It’s very unlikely, and that’s not the problem, it would be okay, even thought they could keep both, the problem is that they are now overpriced, before they were free and now they’re like 120 Robux, and just eliminating them and forcing us to have dinamica heads, and we still don’t have any info on if it’s true or not

1 Like

But the thing is they’re being overpriced, but who cares if there’s 2?!
It’s better because if I want the static one I get the static one, and I don’t get the moving one

So you’re like saying that of everybody is using swords and they’ve always been winning wars because they made battle axes everybody is forced to use battle axes?
Obviously this is just an example but it’s just a nonsense take

The audio update was necessary, this update isn’t, you know how much things have been neglected that we’ve been asking for YEARS, and I mean Y-E-A-R-S, that have been neglected and they put this that nobody’s asked for?

How exactly can this be done?

---------

I thought you guys didn’t want to force people to use your new shiny tech

1 Like

We uh… don’t even really know if that will be possible at all. Since the authenticity of the video supporting that idea is currently debated, we’ll have to wait and see what happens. Maybe if Roblox decides to listen for once they’ll implement that option anyways. In fact, they could turn that into a feature in Studio, allowing developers to always choose the 2d version of the user’s face if it’s required for their game to work properly. That would pretty much fix most people’s problems with this.

1 Like

Continuing the discussion from We’re updating Heads!:

read the continued discussion on how to do so

if everyone is using guns instead of swords, and it’s a sword fight, removing swords altogether and combining guns with swords is what this is

still 2d faces are available, ALL 2d faces, don’t see your point

eggman is correct, however in studio that may not come out, there is no evidence or announcements that it is, the update has to be released first for that to happen, as shown in the video above you will be able to switch from 3D to 2D, so on R6 it would work, and I mean the face may appear as :confused: on R6 however with this update you should be able to edit your face so if its the super super happy face that appears as :confused: you should be able to customize it so it looks happy

1 Like

I don’t wanna be forced to wear one of these hideous, soulless creatures that you call faces. These are creepy, and if you think this is the direction that Roblox should be going, you should have a serious discussion with whoever approved this, and/or thought this was a good idea.

5 Likes

But then it wouldn’t be a sword fight anymore

We still don’t have any official info about that AFAIK, and they are taking them offsale so…

My point is we have asked for a lot of features and Roblox made a lot of promises for years, but now instead of working on that they do a feature nobody/<1% of Roblox players asked for

What did you say?
I would like to see a reusable source from where you got this

No, they don’t. You’re basing this on a 2021 concept video that’s being shared around by people who unfortunately don’t realise that it’s from 2 years ago and has no bearing on the current state of the update.

Again, how does this relate in any way to assets that are created by and sold by the official Roblox account?

3 Likes