i already have it but if i will do it It won’t be useful because what I’m doing now is just writing stuff so it will do the same thing chatgpt does
1 Like
don’t argue with my friend about Quest AI, It just takes 12 seconds to search at google for results on what you typed, ChatGPT and Bing AI are more of AI than Quest AI, you can’t call this an “AI” when it searches it up in google, in-fact, your filter will be gone as roblox will disable filtering in the client (it’s been 6 years and nothing has changed) they even linked this post, I even told you WHYU_RFAT
1 Like
I am pretty sure he knows what Artificial Intelligence (AI) means your product technically is NOT Artificial Intelligence (AI) because it uses an AI model that is owned by someone else therefore you are using it, and this is not your own AI this is somebody’s else. (I assume this is ChatGPT)
Also, there is "Real Artificial Intelligence (AI)" for example a McDonalds place has a robot, and no workers are there would that be considered “Real AI”? because the robot does everything that a worker does in McDonalds.
1 Like
You are the type of person who didn’t know about the existence of ai before chatgpt
This is really true, I agree 
Well, AIs that collect data from the internet actually interact with websites and read data from various sources.
Your AI simply uses the Wikipedia API or a similar API. To be honest, it appears more like a search engine to me, considering that if you type ‘2+2’ on Google, it provides an answer as well.
This is what AI do, it actually reads DATA from different sources.
Conclusion: You cannot give “He know everything that on the internet:” title to your “Search engine”.
1 Like
Wikipedia API:
7 Likes
You are the type of person who doesn’t know about the existance of ai even after chatgpt
What a shame that you are trying to monetize the usage of wikipedia API by using
wait(10) (not task.wait for a reason) if user doesn’t have your “Pro”. Please remove “AI” from your post title and stop trying to monetize public API usage, every release you made is something that was scripted in 2 minutes, yet u still put 1000+ robux for your creations.
5 Likes
Exactly, its disgusting how there charging over 1000 ROBUX for assets that they’ve put 0 effort into, yet even after purchasing it, you still need to buy Pro? just to skip a wait(10), that’s the most scummy and choppy thing a developer can do double charge for something just to skip a simple wait, its so lazy and it seems all this “developer” wants is to make a quick buck from roblox users, the fact it also has AI in the name yet all it does is fetch from Wikipedia, its not even searching from other sources so It cant be an AI.
Some tips I recommend:
Remove your scummy wait
Remove AI from the title as it clearly isn’t an AI
Stop double charging for the asset then the pro version?
If Someone is already paying a load of ROBUX for a public API with a UI, then how about we remove the “Pro” feature, they’ve already donated a massive amount to you not sure why you need to have another feature just to skip a simple wait() its lazy, scummy and unprofessional.
Change your acts.
3 Likes
Any intention to open source this? I am extremely skeptical about this being an “AI” since this just seems to send a request to Google.
It seems to freak out when I ask simple questions:
Edit:
This should be “I’m sorry, but I can’t find a good answer for that.”
1 Like
if u like “AI” learn and try this and make ur self AI Model for ur plugin?i hope you good enough with math
1 Like
“an swear” 
lol its bad english or just a typo? *second image
1 Like
In short:
- Player inputs query
- wait(10)
- Filter it, bans you for any word that doesnt pass the filter, which is in the client lmfao
- Query goes through Wikipedia API:
- If exists, returns the first paragraph
- If it does not exist in Wikipedia:
- Look it up in DataStore where the player would’ve “taught” the “AI” the thing,
- If it exists, returns any result,
- If it doesnt, return a random text.
3 Likes
That’s pretty janky for a game like this. Wondering when the feedback received for this game would actually be considered and added into the game.
1 Like
Problem is that this guy doesn’t even read feedbacks.
3 Likes
You’re right. That really defeats the purpose of making this whole topic.
1 Like
What makes everyone think it uses the wikipedia api.
and i read feedbacks, simply, most of the “feedback” is incorrect things that repeat themselves.
Everyone literally tested this thing. I don’t care if it’s a Wikipedia API or not, but this is just straightforward embarrassing.
Across your 12 posts you ignored approximately 102 posts related to feedback from developers and myself alike. You only did care about the feedback about the smallest things, and none about the actual game or plugin itself. In this one for instance, you only chose to implement the Roblox filter instead of using a blacklist system (in order not to get banned) but please do your research before even implementing the filter. It’s not properly implemented. You have the documentation.
If you want to deny the “Wikipedia API” accusations, at least tell us what API you’re using. Can’t credit yourself as the author of something, while using tools you didn’t make, fair?
I expected better from you but nothing happened. One thing is that you like to make things, but another is making solutions for nonexistent problems or making solutions that require the solution for that same problem. You took NO feedback, positive or not, you KEPT ignoring every argument we’ve said, because you don’t even understand us (translator exists, ayo), and I think that everyone who even bothered their time and money deserve way better than how you treated them. They got the product, gave time to test the product they paid for, gave you feedback for the product, then your simple answer is “naah your feedback sucks ill just go on adding more useless features” like then why even post it in the first place.
Of course I am mad. If you want people to use your products, please first find actual problems, then take your time, take your actual time into making them. Improve your code, learn more and then you’ll make good stuff. But this? No, thank, you.
5 Likes