There was only 3 posts on the topic I dont get how that would clutter it and it was related to UGC (btw if u could answer this question id be grateful)
Yep, I made that topic. I can say with almost extreme certainty that most of my moderation actions are from flags. Thereâs little to no reason a moderator would pursue some of them on their own, especially for how much of a stretch them being removed is. I seriously think the whole process can be boiled down to this:
Someone flags appropriate topic/post > Moderator reads topic/post without taking in context and details > Moderator removes it even if it complies with rules
This one was uncalled for It was about development cause I wanted to know if other people are able to do this so that I may know in the future if i could use such and obviously people abuse the flags yet again and the moderation is not checking the context of such
This is an interesting perspective but I think is the wrong outcome. I do understand how you go there.
Flags are ultimately the way the community can say I think this is against the rules, please review. Limiting that ability I believe is more damaging and wouldnât solve the root problem I see here.
I see a few keys points on whatâs not quite right:
A lack of clarity on the difference between feedback notices and strikes (entirely valid)
The moderation tooling not allowing enough context
The specifics of any one rule as well as specifics of any categoryâs use is not quite right
The messaging used when feedback messages are given is not giving the best message
With that out of the way some context, Iâve been on the forum for many years and personally met many of the people behind the forums, including some of the folks moderating this forum, I can absolutely confirm theyâre human and lovely people.
If thereâs anything Iâve learnt from Post Approval (approving bugs, feature requests, moving threads around) is that having pre-written statements is so much faster and allows for automation to make things quicker. The same is the case for the mod team and makes flag to action much lower as a result.
Moderation at scale means that mistakes will be made, but that means that users also have to understand that and go through the appeals process; which appears to be been made more clearer.
DevRel is the final word and authority on whatâs within the rules on the forums, so as forum users we should ultimately leave it to them to inform users of any issues.
In past years users openly mini-modded and replied to threads telling them to move it to another category, I saw this behaviour and made Reduce Mini-modding on the DevForums to deal with this problem which ultimately led to global rule 3.1 being a thing but as I said in that thread I think thereâs value in privately informing folks as nothing more as a nice heads up, much of the content of that thread is still a helpful read today.
DevRel does deal with mass flaggers and malicious flaggers, I have seen people get strikes for it and someone from DevRel messaged me about ~80 flags I did on one post, we ended up having a discussion and all was agreed to in the end.
In the end, flags are just the community way of saying I think something should be done about this thread. Feedback notices from DevRel are simply informing you of feedback and that itâs a way to adapt and ensure you donât break the rules. You need to appeal when mistakes happen.
Apparently complaining about age recommendations and then linking similar games of the same genre counts as a âcalloutâ and my post was removed from âcommunity flagsââŚ
90% of the time I post I get removed from someone flagging my post for whatever reason. Itâs impossible to say anything on this forum anymore.
Most threads are just people back and forth arguing which makes every topic useless to read anyways yet nobody seems to flag those.
If you think using Robloxâs standard appeal process is the wrong path feel free to supporting existing forum feature requests or create your own, providing your use cases as with every feature request.
You can also communicate with DevRel to better understand why these posts are taken down and if there is anything you can do to adjust your tone and wording. Feel free to flag threads you think violate the rules, reviewing them once in a while may provide some guidance.
The problem is they care so much about little but when someone says something actually concerning its quite rude this has been up for like 4 weeks and Im quite offended
prude | pruËd | noun a person who is or claims to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity
True, I feel like people (not trying to target a specific group) get information from the title. I have seen MANY and i mean MANY posts that get taken down yet it abides all the rules.
You shouldnât be talking like this here anyway, take that junk to reddit and twitter instead. Donât soil where you sleep, etc; this is where we go to get problems solved. Go elsewhere for crude language and bad jokes.
Iâve seen people use way worse language, along with it wasnât intended to be a joke.
Even if itâs not appropriate for the Dev Forum, it doesnât make the flag any more real.
Finally, Dev Discussion is more of a off topic category compared to something like Scripting Support, so I donât see how it was inappropriate. Dev discussion isnât made for help developing.