It really depends on what the units of mass actually are, since inertia is independent of gravity. But I don’t really know the answer to that.

# How many studs is there in a meter

**Flostrus**#22

But gravity is independent of mass too (atleast for the object being attracted by it), that is why a feather will fall just as quickly as a stone if we ignore airresistance

**0xBAADF00D**#23

Yes, but if you push on an object with the same force, it will always experience the same acceleration regardless of the gravity field it’s in.

**MarcusDeving**#24

Thanks for the replies. So to summarize: If you we count to scale from human-sized buildings to Roblox size. The measurements would be 1 meter = 3 studs. Although in accordance from a Roblox blog post: Gravity in roblox is 196.2 studs/s^2 (print(workspace.Gravity)

Gravity on earth is ~9.81 meters/s^2

(196.2stud/s^2) / (9.81 * meter/s^2) = 20stud/meter

**SturdyStubs**#25

I know this is a very late response to this topic and that there is already a solution but I wanted to share what the walkspeed was if I were to walk 16 walkspeed. So what I did was measure out a length, which was 102.05 studs, and then set a timer and walked to a brick which stopped my timer. So the calculation here is, if you have 20 studs per meter, 102.05/20 which would equal 5.1025 meters. If you are passed freshmen year of physics class you would know that if you take the distance divided by the time you would find the speed of an object. So the time I got was 6.6 exactly and so I did 5.1025/6.6 which gave me .77310606 m/s.

So if you were to try and find the speed of a character, you take the distance divided by the time. In my results, I found that the walkspeed of a character in meters was approx. .77 m/s.

**cemetarytree**#26

Are you sure the workspace gravity should be 32.2? i tried it and it seems to be like you are walking on the moon.

**AllYourBlox**#28

32.2 studs/s^2 is technically correct if for 1 stud = 1 foot, but you have to adjust Humanoid.JumpPower accordingly, to ~8.2, but I still don’t think this ends up looking too good so I usually leave gravity as is. I think the very high default elasticity of collisions has a lot of do with how it looks. Also, falling things look slower when there is no motion blur or when you’re zoomed out with little sense of scale.

**Widgeon**#29

Correct, everything is relative, if you used to high jump power and high gravity, obviously moving to a lower gravity is going to seem moon like. However yes 32.2 is correct. You have to adjust jump power and other physics objects if you didn’t design around a gravity of 32.2.